NOBLvsIMCVETF Comparison
VS
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. NOBL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, IMCV's top sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Healthcare. NOBL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.06% for IMCV. NOBL is up 13.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$656M in YTD flows. IMCV performs better with 20.82% YTD performance, and +$163M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NOBL and IMCV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NOBL vs IMCV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NOBL IMCV | +5.73%+5.03% | +4.22%+4.95% | +13.84%+20.82% | +15.64%+24.32% | +46.25%+80.95% | +38.55%+64.14% |
| Flows | NOBL IMCV | -$77M+$63M | -$197M+$83M | -$656M+$163M | -$1.02B+$186M | -$2.38B+$357M | -$36M+$433M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NOBL IMCV | +12.53%+10.27% | +12.17%+11.21% | +12.69%+14.00% | +14.34%+16.34% |
| Max drawdown | NOBL IMCV | -8.01%-6.44% | -9.14%-7.02% | -15.22%-18.64% | -17.94%-19.72% |
| Max drawdown duration | NOBL IMCV | 58d58d | 122d62d | 400d269d | 561d602d |
Trading data
NOBL | IMCV | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.29 | $98.08 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $58.32 | $97.99 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NOBL | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NOBL | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.29 | $98.08 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | +0.09% |
| AuM | $11.73 B | $1.25 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.06% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NOBL
USA
91.18%
Other
8.82%
IMCV
USA
97.02%
Other
2.98%
Sectors
NOBL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.55%
Industrials
18.24%
Finance
14.19%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.69%
Healthcare
10.68%
Other
23.65%
IMCV
Finance
24.24%
Energy
12.89%
Healthcare
11.11%
Industrials
9.46%
Utilities
8.64%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.56%
Other
25.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
NOBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.23%
IMCV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.19%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NOBL
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.72%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.71%
Erie Indemnity Co.
1.70%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
1.68%
Target Corp.
1.65%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.62%
Abbott Laboratories
1.61%
Genuine Parts Co.
1.59%
Nordson Corp.
1.59%
International Business Machines Corp.
1.58%
Albemarle Corp.
1.58%
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.56%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.55%
Medtronic Plc
1.55%
Fastenal Co.
1.54%
IMCV
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.59%
Valero Energy Corp.
1.47%
Phillips 66
1.37%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
1.33%
U.S. Bancorp
1.32%
3M Co.
1.24%
SLB Ltd.
1.23%
Elevance Health, Inc.
1.13%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.11%
Mondelez International, Inc.
1.11%
General Motors Co.
1.08%
United Parcel Service, Inc.
1.07%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
1.07%
EOG Resources, Inc.
1.06%
Target Corp.
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about NOBL and IMCV
How have the NOBL and IMCV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, NOBL is up 13.84% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCV has returned 20.82%. That puts IMCV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NOBL or IMCV?
Year-to-date, the NOBL ETF saw -$656M in flows, compared to +$163M for IMCV.
Which ETF is more volatile: NOBL or IMCV?
Over the past year, NOBL had a volatility of 12.17%, while IMCV experienced 11.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: NOBL or IMCV?
As of October 23, 2026, NOBL holds $11.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while IMCV manages $1.25 B.
What sectors do the NOBL and IMCV ETFs invest in?
NOBL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, IMCV focuses on Finance, Energy and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the NOBL ETF and IMCV ETF?
NOBL top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Roper Technologies, Inc. and Erie Indemnity Co.. IMCV holds in its top three: Automatic Data Processing, Inc., Valero Energy Corp. and Phillips 66.
Which ETF is more diversified: NOBL or IMCV?
NOBL holds 68 securities with 24.23% of its assets in the top 15. IMCV has 269 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.19%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NOBL & IMCV
Advertisement
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Advertisement
