NOBLvsFTCSETF Comparison
VS
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. NOBL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FTCS's top sector exposures are Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. NOBL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.52% for FTCS. NOBL is up 13.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$656M in YTD flows. FTCS performs worse with 9.95% YTD performance, and -$904M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NOBL and FTCS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NOBL vs FTCS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NOBL FTCS | +5.73%+5.68% | +4.22%+5.11% | +13.84%+9.95% | +15.64%+8.91% | +46.25%+43.49% | +38.55%+34.45% |
| Flows | NOBL FTCS | -$77M-$135M | -$197M-$239M | -$656M-$904M | -$1.02B-$1.13B | -$2.38B-$3.15B | -$36M-$2.78B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NOBL FTCS | +12.53%+12.14% | +12.17%+11.00% | +12.69%+11.57% | +14.34%+13.37% |
| Max drawdown | NOBL FTCS | -8.01%-8.11% | -9.14%-8.11% | -15.22%-12.52% | -17.94%-21.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | NOBL FTCS | 58d58d | 122d58d | 400d254d | 561d777d |
Trading data
NOBL | FTCS | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 7:54 PM | $58.30 | $100.90 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $58.32 | $100.72 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NOBL | FTCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 7:54 PM
Live
Closed
NOBL | FTCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.30 | $100.90 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.18% |
| AuM | $11.73 B | $7.81 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.52% |
Characteristics
NOBL | FTCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index | The Capital Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 9, 2013 | July 6, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NOBL
USA
91.18%
Other
8.82%
FTCS
USA
93.89%
Other
6.11%
Sectors
NOBL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.55%
Industrials
18.24%
Finance
14.19%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.69%
Healthcare
10.68%
Other
23.65%
FTCS
Finance
23.3%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
18.84%
Industrials
15.51%
Healthcare
15.2%
Other
27.15%
Advertisement
Diversification
NOBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.23%
FTCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NOBL
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.72%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.71%
Erie Indemnity Co.
1.70%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
1.68%
Target Corp.
1.65%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.62%
Abbott Laboratories
1.61%
Genuine Parts Co.
1.59%
Nordson Corp.
1.59%
International Business Machines Corp.
1.58%
Albemarle Corp.
1.58%
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.56%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.55%
Medtronic Plc
1.55%
Fastenal Co.
1.54%
FTCS
Airbnb, Inc.
2.42%
Amgen, Inc.
2.32%
Copart, Inc.
2.28%
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.28%
CME Group, Inc.
2.27%
ResMed, Inc.
2.25%
Expand Energy Corp.
2.20%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.19%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
2.16%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.15%
Garmin Ltd.
2.14%
Paychex, Inc.
2.13%
The Coca-Cola Co.
2.09%
Johnson & Johnson
2.08%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.07%
Frequently asked questions about NOBL and FTCS
How have the NOBL and FTCS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, NOBL is up 13.84% year-to-date (YTD), while FTCS has returned 9.95%. That puts NOBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NOBL or FTCS?
Year-to-date, the NOBL ETF saw -$656M in flows, compared to -$904M for FTCS.
Which ETF is more volatile: NOBL or FTCS?
Over the past year, NOBL had a volatility of 12.17%, while FTCS experienced 11%.
Which ETF is bigger: NOBL or FTCS?
As of October 23, 2026, NOBL holds $11.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while FTCS manages $7.81 B.
What sectors do the NOBL and FTCS ETFs invest in?
NOBL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FTCS focuses on Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NOBL ETF and FTCS ETF?
NOBL top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Roper Technologies, Inc. and Erie Indemnity Co.. FTCS holds in its top three: Airbnb, Inc., Amgen, Inc. and Copart, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: NOBL or FTCS?
NOBL holds 68 securities with 24.23% of its assets in the top 15. FTCS has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.03%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NOBL & FTCS
Advertisement
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Advertisement
