NOBLvsFDVETF Comparison
VS
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. NOBL's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FDV's top sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Healthcare. NOBL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.61% for FDV. NOBL is up 12.24% year-to-date (YTD) with -$636M in YTD flows. FDV performs better with 18.22% YTD performance, and +$272M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NOBL and FDV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NOBL vs FDV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/20/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NOBL FDV | +4.19%+2.25% | +2.28%+2.31% | +12.24%+18.22% | +14.19%+18.16% | +43.31%+64.80% | +37.49%n/a |
| Flows | NOBL FDV | -$62M+$51M | -$177M+$121M | -$636M+$272M | -$1.02B+$395M | -$2.36B+$760M | -$350M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NOBL FDV | +11.48%+10.50% | +11.90%+10.72% | +12.62%+12.17% | +14.29%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NOBL FDV | -8.01%-7.49% | -9.14%-7.49% | -15.22%-12.77% | -17.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NOBL FDV | 57d56d | 122d56d | 400d129d | 561dn/a |
Trading data
NOBL | FDV | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $57.49 | $33.54 |
| Previous close 10/20/2026 | $56.79 | $33.07 |
| Consolidated volume 10/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FDV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexNOBL | FDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NOBL | FDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $57.49 | $33.54 |
| 1D performance | +1.23% | +1.42% |
| AuM | $11.58 B | $965.06 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.61% |
Characteristics
NOBL | FDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | ProShares | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 51 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 9, 2013 | November 15, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NOBL
USA
91.18%
Other
8.82%
FDV
USA
93.42%
Other
6.58%
Sectors
NOBL
Consumer Non-Cycl.
21.55%
Industrials
18.24%
Finance
14.19%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.69%
Healthcare
10.68%
Other
23.65%
FDV
Finance
22.19%
Utilities
14.06%
Healthcare
13.91%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.76%
Technology
10.02%
Energy
9.52%
Other
18.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
NOBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.23%
FDV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.85%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NOBL
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.72%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.71%
Erie Indemnity Co.
1.70%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
1.68%
Target Corp.
1.65%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.62%
Abbott Laboratories
1.61%
Genuine Parts Co.
1.59%
Nordson Corp.
1.59%
International Business Machines Corp.
1.58%
Albemarle Corp.
1.58%
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.56%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.55%
Medtronic Plc
1.55%
Fastenal Co.
1.54%
FDV
Paychex, Inc.
4.72%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
4.03%
U.S. Bancorp
3.67%
Chevron Corp.
3.52%
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.29%
Amgen, Inc.
3.11%
Prologis, Inc.
2.83%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.80%
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
2.78%
Medtronic Plc
2.78%
Pfizer Inc.
2.51%
Amdocs Ltd.
2.49%
Regions Financial Corp.
2.49%
Amcor Plc
2.44%
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
2.40%
Frequently asked questions about NOBL and FDV
How have the NOBL and FDV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 20, 2026, NOBL is up 12.24% year-to-date (YTD), while FDV has returned 18.22%. That puts FDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NOBL or FDV?
Year-to-date, the NOBL ETF saw -$636M in flows, compared to +$272M for FDV.
Which ETF is more volatile: NOBL or FDV?
Over the past year, NOBL had a volatility of 11.9%, while FDV experienced 10.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: NOBL or FDV?
As of October 20, 2026, NOBL holds $11.58 B in assets under management (AUM), while FDV manages $965.06 M.
What sectors do the NOBL and FDV ETFs invest in?
NOBL leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FDV focuses on Finance, Utilities and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the NOBL ETF and FDV ETF?
NOBL top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Roper Technologies, Inc. and Erie Indemnity Co.. FDV holds in its top three: Paychex, Inc., The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp.
Which ETF is more diversified: NOBL or FDV?
NOBL holds 68 securities with 24.23% of its assets in the top 15. FDV has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.85%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NOBL & FDV
Advertisement
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
NOBL
Advertisement
