Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWNvsSLYVETF Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap Value. IWN's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, SLYV's top sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. IWN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.24%, versus 0.15% for SLYV. IWN is up 5.35% year-to-date (YTD) with -$452M in YTD flows. SLYV performs worse with 3.78% YTD performance, and -$124M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWN and SLYV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWN vs SLYV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWN SLYV | -4.82%-6.56% | +2.44%+1.38% | +5.35%+3.78% | +28.52%+21.13% | +46.88%+32.46% | +27.20%+21.99% |
| Flows | IWN SLYV | +$122M-$118M | -$108M-$152M | -$452M-$124M | -$1.22B-$414M | -$2.58B-$626M | -$5.57B-$170M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWN SLYV | +17.01%+17.50% | +22.01%+23.88% | +21.12%+21.83% | +21.92%+22.29% |
| Max drawdown | IWN SLYV | -5.29%-6.65% | -15.69%-17.09% | -26.60%-28.54% | -26.60%-28.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWN SLYV | 29d30d | 77d98d | 296d379d | 296d379d |
IWN | SLYV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $190.49 | $94.38 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $191.06 | $94.55 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWN | SLYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWN | SLYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $190.49 | $94.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $12.45 B | $4.12 B |
| E/R | 0.24% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWN and SLYV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, IWN is up 5.35% year-to-date (YTD), while SLYV has returned 3.78%. That puts IWN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWN or SLYV?
Year-to-date, the IWN ETF saw -$452M in flows, compared to -$124M for SLYV.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWN or SLYV?
Over the past year, IWN had a volatility of 22.01%, while SLYV experienced 23.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWN or SLYV?
As of March 10, 2026, IWN holds $12.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while SLYV manages $4.12 B.
What sectors do the IWN and SLYV ETFs invest in?
IWN leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SLYV focuses on Financials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IWN ETF and SLYV ETF?
IWN top holdings include ECHOSTAR, HECLA MINING and TTM TECHNOLOGIES. SLYV holds in its top three: LKQ, JACKSON FINANCIAL INC and EASTMAN CHEMICAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWN or SLYV?
IWN holds 1408 securities with 8.72% of its assets in the top 15. SLYV has 460 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.62%.
Will 2024 be the Year of Small Caps and Value Stocks?
Small Caps and Value Stocks Continue to Rally Amid Market Rotation
ETFs for options trading in 2022
Investing in U.S. Small Cap Value ETFs
How to become a value investor using ETFs
How to become a value investor using ETFs
Tax-loss harvesting using ETFs: A guide
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
