Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMIvsRYLDETF Comparison
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.6% for RYLD. IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$214M in YTD flows. RYLD performs worse with 0.11% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and RYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWMI vs RYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWMI RYLD | -3.64%-2.16% | -1.36%+0.70% | +0.28%+0.11% | +23.95%+11.75% | n/a+21.26% | n/a+10.48% |
| Flows | IWMI RYLD | +$59M-$8M | +$259M+$30M | +$214M+$10M | +$488M-$105M | -+$156M | -+$1.86B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWMI RYLD | +14.04%+12.44% | +19.09%+16.80% | n/a+13.42% | n/a+14.66% |
| Max drawdown | IWMI RYLD | -5.83%-4.86% | -15.22%-13.36% | n/a-18.87% | n/a-21.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWMI RYLD | 14d14d | 52d104d | n/a243d | n/a1509d |
IWMI | RYLD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.49 | $15.00 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.68 | $15.04 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWMI | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWMI | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.49 | $15.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $645.76 M | $1.26 B |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.6% |
IWMI | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | NEOS Investment Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 1636 | 1631 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | April 17, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWMI and RYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI is up 0.28% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLD has returned 0.11%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or RYLD?
Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$214M in flows, compared to +$10M for RYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or RYLD?
Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 19.09%, while RYLD experienced 16.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or RYLD?
As of March 12, 2026, IWMI holds $645.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while RYLD manages $1.26 B.
What sectors do the IWMI and RYLD ETFs invest in?
IWMI leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, RYLD focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWMI ETF and RYLD ETF?
IWMI top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET. RYLD holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWMI or RYLD?
IWMI holds 1958 securities with 7.56% of its assets in the top 15. RYLD has 1887 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.85%.
Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
Rohan Reddy with Global X
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.