BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

IWMIvsRYLDETF Comparison

ETF 1

IWMI

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

This fund is part of

Options Strategies

+0.98%

Full IWMI fund page

VS

ETF 2

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

This fund is part of

Options Strategies

+0.98%

Full RYLD fund page

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. IWMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.6% for RYLD. IWMI is up 14.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$918M in YTD flows. RYLD performs worse with 11.78% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWMI and RYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

IWMI vs RYLD performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 11/11/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	IWMI RYLD	+1.99%+0.68%	-3.38%-2.20%	+14.59%+11.78%	+17.08%+12.72%	n/a+34.97%	n/a+9.59%
Flows	IWMI RYLD	+$41M-$13M	+$277M-$21M	+$918M+$7M	+$1,000M+$42M	--$43M	-+$1.33B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	IWMI RYLD	+14.36%+10.94%	+15.46%+10.90%	n/a+13.03%	n/a+14.34%
Max drawdown	IWMI RYLD	-8.32%-6.02%	-8.39%-6.31%	n/a-18.87%	n/a-21.96%
Max drawdown duration	IWMI RYLD	87d76d	46d63d	n/a243d	n/a1509d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	IWMI	RYLD
Last sale 11/13/2026 at 7:21 PM	$48.72	$15.43
Previous close 11/11/2026	$48.90	$15.44
Consolidated volume 11/11/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of October 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

IWMI

is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	IWMI	RYLD
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 11/13/2026 at 7:21 PM

Live

Closed

	IWMI	RYLD
Last price	$48.72	$15.43
1D performance	-0.37%	-0.06%
AuM	$1.35 B	$1.30 B
E/R	0.78%	0.6%

Characteristics

	IWMI	RYLD
Management strategy	Active	Passive
Provider	NEOS Investment Management	Global X
Benchmark	-	Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index
N° of holdings	-	-
Asset class	-	Alternative
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	June 25, 2024	April 17, 2019
ESG	No	No

More IWMI data on Trackinsight

More RYLD data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

IWMI

Data will be available soon

RYLD

Data will be available soon

Sectors

IWMI

Data will be available soon

RYLD

Data will be available soon

Diversification

IWMI

Data will be available soon

RYLD

Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970

IWMI

Data will be available soon

RYLD

Data will be available soon

Frequently asked questions about IWMI and RYLD

How have the IWMI and RYLD ETFs performed in 2026?

As of November 11, 2026, IWMI is up 14.59% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLD has returned 11.78%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or RYLD?

Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$918M in flows, compared to +$7M for RYLD.

Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or RYLD?

Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 15.46%, while RYLD experienced 10.9%.

Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or RYLD?

As of November 11, 2026, IWMI holds $1.35 B in assets under management (AUM), while RYLD manages $1.30 B.

ETF Comparison: NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) Versus Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)

September 25, 2026

IWMI

RYLD

IWMIvsRYLDETF Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

IWMI vs RYLD performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the IWMI and RYLD ETFs performed in 2026?

As of November 11, 2026, IWMI is up 14.59% year-to-date (YTD), while RYLD has returned 11.78%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWMI or RYLD?

Year-to-date, the IWMI ETF saw +$918M in flows, compared to +$7M for RYLD.

Which ETF is more volatile: IWMI or RYLD?

Over the past year, IWMI had a volatility of 15.46%, while RYLD experienced 10.9%.

Which ETF is bigger: IWMI or RYLD?

As of November 11, 2026, IWMI holds $1.35 B in assets under management (AUM), while RYLD manages $1.30 B.

ETF Comparison: NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) Versus Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)

Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs

Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?

Rohan Reddy with Global X

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection