Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWMvsRSSLETF Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. IWM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, RSSL's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.08% for RSSL. IWM is up 0.47% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4.84B in YTD flows. RSSL performs worse with 0.46% YTD performance, and -$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWM and RSSL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWM vs RSSL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWM RSSL | -4.75%-4.73% | -2.18%-2.18% | +0.47%+0.46% | +24.33%+24.40% | +48.29%n/a | +12.53%n/a |
| Flows | IWM RSSL | -$2.39B+$8M | -$2.93B-$78M | -$4.84B-$28M | -$7.34B-$381M | -$379M- | -$6.82B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWM RSSL | +18.70%+18.43% | +23.21%+23.16% | +21.21%n/a | +22.68%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWM RSSL | -8.31%-8.31% | -16.45%-16.46% | -27.52%n/a | -31.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWM RSSL | 49d49d | 52d52d | 289dn/a | 1093dn/a |
IWM | RSSL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:15 PM | $246.35 | $96.72 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $247.41 | $96.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWM | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWM | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $246.35 | $96.72 |
| 1D performance | -0.43% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $69.44 B | $1.33 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWM and RSSL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, IWM is up 0.47% year-to-date (YTD), while RSSL has returned 0.46%. That puts IWM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWM or RSSL?
Year-to-date, the IWM ETF saw -$4.84B in flows, compared to -$28M for RSSL.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWM or RSSL?
Over the past year, IWM had a volatility of 23.21%, while RSSL experienced 23.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWM or RSSL?
As of March 12, 2026, IWM holds $69.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while RSSL manages $1.33 B.
What sectors do the IWM and RSSL ETFs invest in?
IWM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, RSSL focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IWM ETF and RSSL ETF?
IWM top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. RSSL holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWM or RSSL?
IWM holds 1942 securities with 7.78% of its assets in the top 15. RSSL has 1883 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.74%.
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 6/27/25: Big Tech is SO Back. Again.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
