IWMvsRSSLETF Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. IWM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.08% for RSSL. IWM is up 10.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5.65B in YTD flows. RSSL performs better with 10.73% YTD performance, and -$100M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWM and RSSL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWM vs RSSL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWM RSSL | +13.56%+13.56% | +3.46%+3.50% | +10.71%+10.73% | +40.21%+40.33% | +60.80%n/a | +26.98%n/a |
| Flows | IWM RSSL | -$1.61B-$115M | -$2.83B-$60M | -$5.65B-$100M | -$5.36B-$493M | -$74M- | -$3.33B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWM RSSL | +21.90%+21.64% | +19.38%+19.32% | +21.25%n/a | +22.60%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWM RSSL | -10.06%-10.04% | -11.03%-11.01% | -27.52%n/a | -31.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWM RSSL | 63d63d | 82d82d | 289dn/a | 1093dn/a |
IWM | RSSL | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $272.08 | $106.46 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $273.91 | $107.19 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWM | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWM | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $272.08 | $106.46 |
| 1D performance | -0.67% | -0.68% |
| AuM | $75.57 B | $1.40 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
