IWMvsFSCCETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. IWM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, FSCC's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. IWM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.51% for FSCC. IWM is up 12.8% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7.92B in YTD flows. FSCC performs worse with 12.62% YTD performance, and +$359M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWM and FSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWM vs FSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWM FSCC | -2.13%-2.34% | -5.28%-5.04% | +12.80%+12.62% | +13.07%+15.43% | +72.87%n/a | +27.92%n/a |
| Flows | IWM FSCC | -$328M+$27M | -$1.69B+$159M | -$7.92B+$359M | -$3.36B+$379M | -$3.41B- | -$7.73B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWM FSCC | +13.94%+13.20% | +18.21%+17.91% | +21.10%n/a | +22.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWM FSCC | -11.10%-8.79% | -11.10%-11.21% | -27.52%n/a | -31.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWM FSCC | 68d67d | 68d114d | 289dn/a | 1093dn/a |
Trading data
IWM | FSCC | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $275.75 | $33.64 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $276.67 | $33.78 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FSCC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWM | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWM | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $275.75 | $33.64 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.41% |
| AuM | $74.21 B | $443.61 M |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.51% |
Characteristics
IWM | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1940 | 311 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2000 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWM
USA
94.99%
Other
5.01%
FSCC
USA
91.13%
Other
8.87%
Sectors
IWM
Finance
26.05%
Healthcare
20.69%
Technology
11.8%
Industrials
10.33%
Other
31.12%
FSCC
Finance
28.04%
Healthcare
21.66%
Industrials
12.51%
Technology
11.57%
Other
26.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.62%
FSCC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IWM
JFrog Ltd.
0.35%
Moog, Inc.
0.34%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.34%
Glaukos Corp.
0.33%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.33%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.30%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.30%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.29%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.29%
SM Energy Co.
0.29%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.28%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.28%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.28%
FSCC
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
2.10%
Postal Realty Trust, Inc.
1.27%
SPS Commerce, Inc.
1.19%
Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd.
1.11%
BankUnited, Inc.
1.06%
Sphere Entertainment Co.
1.04%
Slide Insurance Holdings, Inc.
1.04%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
1.02%
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
1.00%
Byline Bancorp, Inc.
0.99%
Janux Therapeutics, Inc.
0.99%
Hecla Mining Co.
0.97%
Liquidia Corp.
0.97%
Indivior Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.94%
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Ltd.
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about IWM and FSCC
How have the IWM and FSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, IWM is up 12.8% year-to-date (YTD), while FSCC has returned 12.62%. That puts IWM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWM or FSCC?
Year-to-date, the IWM ETF saw -$7.92B in flows, compared to +$359M for FSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWM or FSCC?
Over the past year, IWM had a volatility of 18.21%, while FSCC experienced 17.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWM or FSCC?
As of October 23, 2026, IWM holds $74.21 B in assets under management (AUM), while FSCC manages $443.61 M.
What sectors do the IWM and FSCC ETFs invest in?
IWM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, FSCC focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the IWM ETF and FSCC ETF?
IWM top holdings include JFrog Ltd., Moog, Inc. and UMB Financial Corp.. FSCC holds in its top three: American Healthcare REIT, Inc., Postal Realty Trust, Inc. and SPS Commerce, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IWM or FSCC?
IWM holds 1953 securities with 4.62% of its assets in the top 15. FSCC has 311 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.59%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IWM & FSCC
Advertisement
