IWMvsFSCCETF Comparison
VS
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. IWM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, FSCC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. IWM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.51% for FSCC. IWM is up 14.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5.38B in YTD flows. FSCC performs worse with 13.19% YTD performance, and +$122M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWM and FSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IWM vs FSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWM FSCC | +12.01%+13.44% | +10.66%+7.26% | +14.99%+13.19% | +43.59%+46.59% | +67.85%n/a | +35.07%n/a |
| Flows | IWM FSCC | -$1.91B+$26M | -$1.91B+$82M | -$5.38B+$122M | -$4.51B+$179M | +$766M- | -$3.75B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWM FSCC | +22.03%+21.66% | +19.41%+19.56% | +21.22%n/a | +22.62%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IWM FSCC | -10.06%-10.67% | -11.03%-11.07% | -27.52%n/a | -31.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IWM FSCC | 63d64d | 82d83d | 289dn/a | 1093dn/a |
Trading data
IWM | FSCC | |
Last sale 5/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $282.56 | $34.44 |
| Previous close 05/05/2026 | $277.88 | $33.82 |
| Consolidated volume 05/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FSCC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIWM | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IWM | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $282.56 | $34.44 |
| 1D performance | +1.68% | +1.83% |
| AuM | $78.79 B | $216.81 M |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.51% |
Characteristics
IWM | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1612 | 274 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2000 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IWM
USA
92.1%
Other
7.9%
FSCC
USA
77.88%
Other
22.12%
Sectors
IWM
Industrials
15.39%
Health Care
15.1%
Financials
14.5%
Information Techn.
14.1%
Consumer Discreti.
8.42%
Other
32.5%
FSCC
Industrials
16.43%
Financials
14.84%
Health Care
14.5%
Information Techn.
13.93%
Consumer Discreti.
7.26%
Other
33.03%
Advertisement
Diversification
IWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.51%
FSCC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.98%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IWM
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.01%
COEUR MINING INC
0.65%
FABRINET
0.64%
US65290E1010
0.60%
ECHOSTAR
0.54%
CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING
0.52%
KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS
0.43%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
0.41%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
0.41%
HECLA MINING
0.40%
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA
0.40%
GUARDANT HEALTH INC
0.39%
MODINE MNFC CO
0.39%
ENSIGN GROUP
0.38%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
0.34%
FSCC
PRIMORIS SERVICES
1.66%
MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC
1.37%
JACKSON FINANCIAL INC
1.29%
POWELL INDUSTRIES
1.28%
BANKUNITED
1.23%
SPS COMMERCE
1.16%
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN ENTERTAINMENT CORP
1.12%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.08%
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS SER
1.06%
TALOS ENERGY INC
0.99%
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP
0.98%
FB FINANCIAL
0.97%
EMCOR GROUP
0.96%
FLUOR
0.94%
CNX RESOURCES CORP
0.90%
Frequently asked questions about IWM and FSCC
How have the IWM and FSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 5, 2026, IWM is up 14.99% year-to-date (YTD), while FSCC has returned 13.19%. That puts IWM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWM or FSCC?
Year-to-date, the IWM ETF saw -$5.38B in flows, compared to +$122M for FSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWM or FSCC?
Over the past year, IWM had a volatility of 19.41%, while FSCC experienced 19.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWM or FSCC?
As of May 5, 2026, IWM holds $78.79 B in assets under management (AUM), while FSCC manages $216.81 M.
What sectors do the IWM and FSCC ETFs invest in?
IWM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, FSCC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the IWM ETF and FSCC ETF?
IWM top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, COEUR MINING INC and FABRINET. FSCC holds in its top three: PRIMORIS SERVICES, MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWM or FSCC?
IWM holds 1934 securities with 7.51% of its assets in the top 15. FSCC has 276 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.98%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IWM & FSCC
Advertisement
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 6/27/25: Big Tech is SO Back. Again.
June 27, 2025
IWM
Advertisement
