Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
IWFGvsMGKETF Comparison
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. IWFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.2%, versus 0.05% for MGK. IWFG is down -7.79% year-to-date (YTD) with -$536K in YTD flows. MGK performs better with -7.07% YTD performance, and -$1.19B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IWFG and MGK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
IWFG vs MGK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IWFG MGK | -2.04%-0.81% | -9.07%-6.30% | -7.79%-7.07% | +14.81%+22.62% | +92.36%+109.40% | n/a+91.94% |
| Flows | IWFG MGK | +$1K-$738M | -$536K-$1.35B | -$536K-$1.19B | +$46M+$885M | +$47M+$5.60B | -+$7.54B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IWFG MGK | +16.73%+15.88% | +22.57%+23.37% | +19.50%+19.69% | n/a+22.63% |
| Max drawdown | IWFG MGK | -9.94%-8.41% | -14.95%-16.10% | -21.89%-23.44% | n/a-36.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | IWFG MGK | 90d77d | 37d45d | 133d124d | n/a745d |
IWFG | MGK | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:46 PM | $48.39 | $384.26 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $49.25 | $383.41 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
IWFG | MGK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
IWFG | MGK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.39 | $384.26 |
| 1D performance | -1.73% | +0.22% |
| AuM | $54.19 M | $28.92 B |
| E/R | 1.2% | 0.05% |
IWFG | MGK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | New York Life Investments | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | CRSP U.S. Mega Cap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 57 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2022 | December 17, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the IWFG and MGK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, IWFG is down -7.79% year-to-date (YTD), while MGK has lost -7.07%. That puts MGK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IWFG or MGK?
Year-to-date, the IWFG ETF saw -$536K in flows, compared to -$1.19B for MGK.
Which ETF is more volatile: IWFG or MGK?
Over the past year, IWFG had a volatility of 22.57%, while MGK experienced 23.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: IWFG or MGK?
As of March 11, 2026, IWFG holds $54.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while MGK manages $28.92 B.
What sectors do the IWFG and MGK ETFs invest in?
IWFG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, MGK focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IWFG ETF and MGK ETF?
IWFG top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and AMAZON.COM INC. MGK holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: IWFG or MGK?
IWFG holds 24 securities with 78.95% of its assets in the top 15. MGK has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.2%.
Tech & Growth ETF Alternatives to the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)
Barry Peters from Winslow Capital discusses IWFG
ETFs for Exposure to the "Magnificent Seven" Stocks
How to become a growth investor using ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
