IBATvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. IBAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.39% for ICLN. IBAT is up 63.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$53M in YTD flows. ICLN performs worse with 29.16% YTD performance, and +$637M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT ICLN | +8.12%-0.78% | +39.91%+15.35% | +63.55%+29.16% | +125.25%+67.80% | n/a+19.95% | n/a+0.76% |
| Flows | IBAT ICLN | -$2M+$263M | +$29M+$615M | +$53M+$637M | +$55M+$767M | --$987M | --$1.37B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT ICLN | +34.47%+34.23% | +27.41%+26.29% | n/a+23.70% | n/a+26.00% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT ICLN | -13.79%-15.98% | -13.79%-15.98% | n/a-42.62% | n/a-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT ICLN | 16d16d | 16d16d | n/a924d | n/a1690d |
Trading data
IBAT | ICLN | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.56 | $21.10 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $45.60 | $20.48 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.56 | $21.10 |
| 1D performance | +2.11% | +3.03% |
| AuM | $83.85 M | $3.07 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
IBAT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 92 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | June 24, 2008 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
USA
23.61%
Japan
23%
Republic of Korea
17.91%
France
7.89%
China
7.6%
Other
19.98%
ICLN
USA
43.27%
China
20.36%
Other
36.38%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
42.9%
Materials
29.9%
Information Techn.
22.53%
Other
4.66%
ICLN
Utilities
34.36%
Industrials
33.07%
Information Techn.
17.31%
Other
15.26%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
75.04%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.6%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
IBAT
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
11.41%
SAMSUNG SDI
8.64%
MURATA MFG
6.68%
BASF SE
5.46%
FURUKAWA ELEC
5.25%
AIR LIQUIDE
5.18%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
4.91%
AMPEREX TECH
4.54%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
4.26%
LG CHEMICAL
3.63%
ASAHI KASEI
3.36%
DELTA ELECTRONIC
3.26%
EATON CORP PLC
3.02%
ABB
2.83%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
2.61%
ICLN
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
13.73%
US65290E1010
7.28%
FIRST SOLAR
7.15%
YANGTZE POWER
5.89%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
3.35%
PLUG POWER
3.28%
ENPHASE ENERGY
3.24%
EQUATORIAL ENERGIA
2.87%
SUZLON ENERGY
2.36%
ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL
2.33%
CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER
2.01%
SOLAREDGE TECH/D
1.93%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC
1.88%
ORSTED
1.84%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY
1.47%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and ICLN
How have the IBAT and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, IBAT is up 63.55% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 29.16%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$53M in flows, compared to +$637M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or ICLN?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 27.41%, while ICLN experienced 26.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or ICLN?
As of June 18, 2026, IBAT holds $83.85 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $3.07 B.
What sectors do the IBAT and ICLN ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and ICLN ETF?
IBAT top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, SAMSUNG SDI and MURATA MFG. ICLN holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US65290E1010 and FIRST SOLAR.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or ICLN?
IBAT holds 64 securities with 75.04% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 105 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.6%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & ICLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
September 20, 2022
ICLN
Week of August 8, 2022 KPI summary
August 16, 2022
ICLN
Advertisement
