IBATvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. IBAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.38% for ICLN. IBAT is up 38.7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. ICLN performs worse with 7.44% YTD performance, and +$163M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT ICLN | -5.54%-3.32% | -11.91%-16.51% | +38.70%+7.44% | +48.37%+19.90% | n/a+16.15% | n/a-17.87% |
| Flows | IBAT ICLN | -+$23M | -$5M-$468M | +$48M+$163M | +$50M+$289M | --$1.10B | --$1.98B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT ICLN | +36.22%+31.25% | +31.72%+29.01% | n/a+24.60% | n/a+26.59% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT ICLN | -25.61%-21.80% | -25.61%-28.47% | n/a-31.13% | n/a-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT ICLN | 84d84d | 84d104d | n/a631d | n/a1778d |
Trading data
IBAT | ICLN | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 3:45 PM | $39.78 | $17.47 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $39.71 | $17.56 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 3:45 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.78 | $17.47 |
| 1D performance | +0.16% | -0.51% |
| AuM | $66.37 M | $2.11 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
IBAT | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 104 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | June 24, 2008 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
26.85%
USA
21.35%
France
11.3%
Republic of Korea
10.56%
China
9.82%
Germany
7.42%
Other
12.7%
ICLN
USA
36.76%
China
22.42%
Other
40.81%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
42.47%
Non-Energy Materi.
39.31%
Technology
12.13%
Other
6.1%
ICLN
Industrials
48.56%
Utilities
41.75%
Technology
7.31%
Other
2.39%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.31%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.72%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IBAT
Bloom Energy Corp.
7.62%
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
7.41%
BASF SE
7.19%
Air Liquide SA
7.14%
TDK Corp.
5.46%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
4.95%
Schneider Electric SE
4.03%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
3.93%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Linde Plc
3.70%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.69%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.62%
Asahi Kasei Corp.
3.57%
Resonac Holdings Corp.
3.24%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
2.99%
ICLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.92%
First Solar, Inc.
7.85%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.54%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.96%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.56%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.70%
EDP SA
2.68%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.46%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.35%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
2.22%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.00%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.91%
Ørsted A/S
1.62%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and ICLN
How have the IBAT and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, IBAT is up 38.7% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 7.44%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$48M in flows, compared to +$163M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or ICLN?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 31.72%, while ICLN experienced 29.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or ICLN?
As of September 14, 2026, IBAT holds $66.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.11 B.
What sectors do the IBAT and ICLN ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and ICLN ETF?
IBAT top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. and BASF SE. ICLN holds in its top three: China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or ICLN?
IBAT holds 83 securities with 72.31% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.72%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & ICLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
September 20, 2022
ICLN
Week of August 8, 2022 KPI summary
August 16, 2022
ICLN
Advertisement
