Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GLBLvsESGVETF Comparison
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. GLBL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.09% for ESGV. GLBL is down -2.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1K in YTD flows. ESGV performs worse with -2.85% YTD performance, and +$463K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GLBL and ESGV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GLBL vs ESGV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLBL ESGV | -2.22%-2.73% | -3.71%-3.71% | -2.43%-2.85% | +23.82%+21.06% | n/a+81.07% | n/a+69.22% |
| Flows | GLBL ESGV | +$1K-$24M | +$1K+$59M | +$1K+$463K | +$1K+$72M | -+$1.22B | -+$4.03B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GLBL ESGV | +12.77%+12.71% | +17.96%+19.39% | n/a+15.95% | n/a+18.22% |
| Max drawdown | GLBL ESGV | -5.09%-5.24% | -13.57%-14.37% | n/a-20.39% | n/a-28.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | GLBL ESGV | 58d58d | 45d45d | n/a127d | n/a752d |
GLBL | ESGV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 4:20 PM | $115.95 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $117.40 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GLBL | ESGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GLBL | ESGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $115.95 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.24% |
| AuM | $0.98 M | $11.51 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.09% |
GLBL | ESGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Ricardo Comparative Advantage Select GDP Tilted Index | FTSE US All Cap Choice Index |
| N° of holdings | 347 | 1174 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 16, 2024 | September 18, 2018 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GLBL and ESGV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GLBL is down -2.43% year-to-date (YTD), while ESGV has lost -2.85%. That puts GLBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GLBL or ESGV?
Year-to-date, the GLBL ETF saw +$1K in flows, compared to +$463K for ESGV.
Which ETF is more volatile: GLBL or ESGV?
Over the past year, GLBL had a volatility of 17.96%, while ESGV experienced 19.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: GLBL or ESGV?
As of March 11, 2026, GLBL holds $0.98 M in assets under management (AUM), while ESGV manages $11.51 B.
What sectors do the GLBL and ESGV ETFs invest in?
GLBL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ESGV focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GLBL ETF and ESGV ETF?
GLBL top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, AMAZON.COM INC and NVIDIA. ESGV holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: GLBL or ESGV?
GLBL holds 371 securities with 44.64% of its assets in the top 15. ESGV has 1262 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.61%.
The Better, More Rational Way to Structure an ESG ETF
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
Is an "Anti-ESG" thematic ETF possible?
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.