Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FTWOvsQQQETF Comparison
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. FTWO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Energy. In contrast, QQQ's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. FTWO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.18% for QQQ. FTWO is up 13.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. QQQ performs worse with -3.16% YTD performance, and -$10.70B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FTWO and QQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FTWO vs QQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FTWO QQQ | -2.06%-1.83% | +14.90%-2.26% | +13.58%-3.16% | +51.01%+25.95% | n/a+97.64% | n/a+96.54% |
| Flows | FTWO QQQ | +$6M-$4.34B | +$16M-$5.56B | +$16M-$10.70B | +$36M+$10.46B | -+$54.17B | -+$74.09B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FTWO QQQ | +21.27%+15.62% | +21.21%+22.54% | n/a+19.59% | n/a+22.52% |
| Max drawdown | FTWO QQQ | -7.30%-6.22% | -14.13%-15.74% | n/a-22.83% | n/a-35.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | FTWO QQQ | 16d49d | 41d45d | n/a124d | n/a714d |
FTWO | QQQ | |
Last sale 3/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.09 | $594.90 |
| Previous close 03/18/2026 | $46.60 | $603.31 |
| Consolidated volume 03/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FTWO | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FTWO | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.09 | $594.90 |
| 1D performance | -1.09% | -1.39% |
| AuM | $78.52 M | $384.34 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.18% |
FTWO | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Strive Asset Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index | NASDAQ-100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2023 | March 10, 1999 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FTWO and QQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 18, 2026, FTWO is up 13.58% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQ has lost -3.16%. That puts FTWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FTWO or QQQ?
Year-to-date, the FTWO ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to -$10.70B for QQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: FTWO or QQQ?
Over the past year, FTWO had a volatility of 21.21%, while QQQ experienced 22.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: FTWO or QQQ?
As of March 18, 2026, FTWO holds $78.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQ manages $384.34 B.
What sectors do the FTWO and QQQ ETFs invest in?
FTWO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Energy. Meanwhile, QQQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FTWO ETF and QQQ ETF?
FTWO top holdings include DEERE, EXXON and CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP. QQQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FTWO or QQQ?
FTWO holds 50 securities with 66.77% of its assets in the top 15. QQQ has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.54%.
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 1/21/2026: The "Sell America" Trade is Back. Will it Stick?
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 11/12/2025: With the Shutdown Behind Us, Will the Bulls Take Over?
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
