FLQSvsIWMETF Comparison
VS
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is part of the US Small Cap segment. FLQS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, IWM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. FLQS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.19% for IWM. FLQS is up 16.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$28M in YTD flows. IWM performs worse with 16.18% YTD performance, and -$7.29B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLQS and IWM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLQS vs IWM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLQS IWM | +5.92%+1.90% | +0.20%-1.33% | +16.28%+16.18% | +17.91%+16.34% | +59.11%+80.03% | +34.55%+32.62% |
| Flows | FLQS IWM | +$2M-$1.56B | -$3M-$742M | -$28M-$7.29B | -$28M-$2.09B | +$642K-$3.03B | +$18M-$6.58B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLQS IWM | +10.84%+13.93% | +13.60%+18.20% | +17.72%+21.09% | +19.07%+22.42% |
| Max drawdown | FLQS IWM | -7.72%-11.10% | -8.39%-11.10% | -22.82%-27.52% | -28.18%-31.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLQS IWM | 74d74d | 49d74d | 415d289d | 862d1093d |
Trading data
FLQS | IWM | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.02 | $279.39 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $49.60 | $284.01 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLQS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLQS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.02 | $279.39 |
| 1D performance | -1.17% | -1.63% |
| AuM | $49.64 M | $77.07 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
FLQS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Small Cap Equity Index | Russell 2000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 486 | 1955 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 26, 2017 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLQS
USA
92.58%
Other
7.42%
IWM
USA
95.19%
Other
4.81%
Sectors
FLQS
Finance
20.88%
Technology
14.66%
Healthcare
13.91%
Consumer Cyclical.
10.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.37%
Industrials
8.86%
Other
22.08%
IWM
Finance
25.83%
Healthcare
20.64%
Technology
12.66%
Industrials
10.38%
Other
30.5%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLQS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.83%
IWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FLQS
Moog, Inc.
1.04%
InterDigital, Inc.
1.01%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
1.01%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
1.00%
Essent Group Ltd.
0.99%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.95%
Qualys, Inc.
0.94%
Alkermes Plc
0.93%
Commvault Systems, Inc.
0.93%
Cheesecake Factory, Inc.
0.88%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.88%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
0.88%
TXNM Energy, Inc.
0.81%
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
0.79%
Selective Insurance Group, Inc.
0.78%
IWM
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.43%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.38%
Moog, Inc.
0.37%
JFrog Ltd.
0.36%
10X Genomics, Inc.
0.36%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.32%
Glaukos Corp.
0.32%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.30%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.30%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.30%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.30%
Old National Bancorp
0.29%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.29%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.29%
Frequently asked questions about FLQS and IWM
How have the FLQS and IWM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, FLQS is up 16.28% year-to-date (YTD), while IWM has returned 16.18%. That puts FLQS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLQS or IWM?
Year-to-date, the FLQS ETF saw -$28M in flows, compared to -$7.29B for IWM.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLQS or IWM?
Over the past year, FLQS had a volatility of 13.6%, while IWM experienced 18.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLQS or IWM?
As of October 29, 2026, FLQS holds $49.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWM manages $77.07 B.
What sectors do the FLQS and IWM ETFs invest in?
FLQS leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FLQS ETF and IWM ETF?
FLQS top holdings include Moog, Inc., InterDigital, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. IWM holds in its top three: Twist Bioscience Corp., BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury and Moog, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLQS or IWM?
FLQS holds 489 securities with 13.83% of its assets in the top 15. IWM has 1973 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.92%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLQS & IWM
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (October 19-23, 2026)
October 26, 2026
IWM
ETF Comparison: NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) Versus Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)
September 25, 2026
IWM
Advertisement
Advertisement
