FLOWvsQVALETF Comparison
VS
Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF (FLOW) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FLOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Energy. In contrast, QVAL's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Information Technology. FLOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.29% for QVAL. FLOW is up 2.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. QVAL performs better with 12.22% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLOW and QVAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLOW vs QVAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLOW QVAL | +3.86%+5.69% | +0.22%+6.19% | +2.15%+12.22% | +28.33%+35.50% | n/a+69.00% | n/a+75.14% |
| Flows | FLOW QVAL | -$49K+$500K | -$2M+$12M | -$6M+$15M | +$13M+$48M | -+$99M | -+$144M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLOW QVAL | +14.78%+15.12% | +15.97%+14.94% | n/a+17.92% | n/a+21.69% |
| Max drawdown | FLOW QVAL | -6.59%-5.94% | -6.59%-5.94% | n/a-21.39% | n/a-27.03% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLOW QVAL | 73d56d | 73d56d | n/a302d | n/a653d |
Trading data
FLOW | QVAL | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.61 | $54.41 |
| Previous close 04/24/2026 | $36.73 | $54.47 |
| Consolidated volume 04/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QVAL
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLOW | QVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLOW | QVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.61 | $54.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $26.69 M | $511.83 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
FLOW | QVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | Alpha Architect |
| Benchmark | Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 49 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 10, 2023 | October 22, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLOW
USA
95.09%
Other
4.91%
QVAL
USA
95.88%
Other
4.12%
Sectors
FLOW
Information Techn.
18.87%
Consumer Discreti.
18.24%
Energy
13.47%
Consumer Staples
10.4%
Health Care
10.15%
Industrials
8.27%
Other
20.59%
QVAL
Consumer Discreti.
32.03%
Industrials
15.93%
Information Techn.
14%
Health Care
9.99%
Materials
7.95%
Other
20.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.17%
QVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.18%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
FLOW
APA CORPORATION
3.20%
DEVON ENERGY
3.02%
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY
2.82%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
2.78%
ARCHER DANIELS
2.56%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.42%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
2.31%
BIOGEN INC
2.23%
OVINTIV INC
2.22%
CARDINAL HEALTH
2.13%
COMCAST
2.03%
AIRBNB
1.91%
THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY
1.89%
D R HORTON
1.89%
FORD MOTOR
1.75%
QVAL
YETI HOLDINGS INC
2.03%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL
2.02%
PFIZER
2.02%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS
2.01%
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTN
2.01%
TD SYNNEX
2.01%
HF SINCLAIR CORPORATION
2.01%
BEST BUY
2.01%
GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE
2.01%
URBAN OUTFITTERS
2.01%
ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS INC
2.01%
THE GAP
2.01%
DECKERS OUTDOOR
2.01%
EPAM SYSTEMS
2.01%
RANGE RESOURCES
2.00%
Frequently asked questions about FLOW and QVAL
How have the FLOW and QVAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, FLOW is up 2.15% year-to-date (YTD), while QVAL has returned 12.22%. That puts QVAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLOW or QVAL?
Year-to-date, the FLOW ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to +$15M for QVAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLOW or QVAL?
Over the past year, FLOW had a volatility of 15.97%, while QVAL experienced 14.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLOW or QVAL?
As of April 24, 2026, FLOW holds $26.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVAL manages $511.83 M.
What sectors do the FLOW and QVAL ETFs invest in?
FLOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Energy. Meanwhile, QVAL focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FLOW ETF and QVAL ETF?
FLOW top holdings include APA CORPORATION, DEVON ENERGY and DIAMONDBACK ENERGY. QVAL holds in its top three: YETI HOLDINGS INC, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL and PFIZER.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLOW or QVAL?
FLOW holds 99 securities with 35.17% of its assets in the top 15. QVAL has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.18%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLOW & QVAL
There’s An ETF for That? Free Cash Flow
October 10, 2024
FLOW
Three Things You Need to Know Before Investing in an Active ETF
September 5, 2024
QVAL
Global X Launches New ETF Focused on Free Cash Flow
August 15, 2023
FLOW
Advertisement
Advertisement
