FCGvsXOPETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
XOP
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
This fund is part of
US Energy
+0.1%
First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. FCG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.35% for XOP. FCG is up 26.52% year-to-date (YTD) with +$88M in YTD flows. XOP performs better with 41.06% YTD performance, and +$992M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCG and XOP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FCG vs XOP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCG XOP | +7.56%+13.88% | -2.04%+5.45% | +26.52%+41.06% | +28.88%+41.60% | +27.44%+37.00% | +140.49%+139.74% |
| Flows | FCG XOP | -$38M-$238M | -$66M+$212M | +$88M+$992M | +$199M+$985M | +$35M-$937M | +$137M-$2.64B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCG XOP | +28.75%+30.34% | +27.00%+28.28% | +27.26%+28.09% | +33.15%+33.92% |
| Max drawdown | FCG XOP | -16.85%-15.20% | -19.59%-18.50% | -29.46%-34.97% | -33.27%-34.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCG XOP | 80d79d | 116d115d | 679d690d | 1353d690d |
Trading data
FCG | XOP | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.13 | $174.05 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $29.29 | $175.66 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.13 | $174.05 |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | -0.92% |
| AuM | $642.00 M | $3.60 B |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index | S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2007 | June 19, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FCG
USA
89.89%
Other
10.11%
XOP
USA
101.87%
Other
-1.87%
Sectors
FCG
Energy
97.14%
Other
2.86%
XOP
Energy
90.29%
Other
9.71%
Advertisement
Diversification
FCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.06%
XOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.87%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
FCG
Hess Midstream LP
4.93%
Western Midstream Partners LP
4.92%
EOG Resources, Inc.
4.54%
ConocoPhillips
4.37%
EQT Corp.
4.03%
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.01%
Expand Energy Corp.
3.95%
Devon Energy Corp.
3.93%
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
3.88%
Permian Resources Corp.
3.71%
Ovintiv, Inc.
3.58%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.53%
Range Resources Corp.
3.32%
APA Corp.
3.27%
Matador Resources Co.
3.09%
XOP
Texas Pacific Land Corp.
3.25%
PBF Energy, Inc.
2.98%
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
2.88%
Expand Energy Corp.
2.87%
CNX Resources Corp.
2.85%
EQT Corp.
2.82%
Valero Energy Corp.
2.82%
Antero Resources Corp.
2.75%
HF Sinclair Corp.
2.75%
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
2.71%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
2.71%
Range Resources Corp.
2.65%
Viper Energy, Inc.
2.64%
Permian Resources Corp.
2.60%
Phillips 66
2.59%
Frequently asked questions about FCG and XOP
How have the FCG and XOP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 23, 2026, FCG is up 26.52% year-to-date (YTD), while XOP has returned 41.06%. That puts XOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCG or XOP?
Year-to-date, the FCG ETF saw +$88M in flows, compared to +$992M for XOP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCG or XOP?
Over the past year, FCG had a volatility of 27%, while XOP experienced 28.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCG or XOP?
As of July 23, 2026, FCG holds $642.00 M in assets under management (AUM), while XOP manages $3.60 B.
What sectors do the FCG and XOP ETFs invest in?
FCG leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, XOP focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the FCG ETF and XOP ETF?
FCG top holdings include Hess Midstream LP, Western Midstream Partners LP and EOG Resources, Inc.. XOP holds in its top three: Texas Pacific Land Corp., PBF Energy, Inc. and Delek US Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FCG or XOP?
FCG holds 40 securities with 59.06% of its assets in the top 15. XOP has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.87%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FCG & XOP
ETF Comparison: State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Versus State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)
January 27, 2026
XOP
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
November 6, 2024
XOP
Advertisement
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
June 10, 2024
XOP
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
June 10, 2024
XOP
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
June 3, 2024
XOP
War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers
May 15, 2024
XOP
Advertisement
