FCGvsXOPETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
XOP
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
This fund is part of
US Energy
+2.58%
First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. FCG's top 1 sector exposures are Energy. In contrast, XOP's top sector exposures are Energy, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. FCG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.35% for XOP. FCG is up 34.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$95M in YTD flows. XOP performs better with 61.76% YTD performance, and +$1.39B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCG and XOP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FCG vs XOP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCG XOP | +6.54%+10.40% | +6.84%+15.28% | +34.96%+61.76% | +43.61%+58.64% | +27.29%+46.11% | +92.73%+105.19% |
| Flows | FCG XOP | -$23M+$120M | +$2M+$396M | +$95M+$1.39B | +$182M+$1.31B | +$63M-$171M | -$29M-$2.32B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCG XOP | +27.71%+27.81% | +27.42%+28.65% | +27.57%+28.41% | +32.45%+33.25% |
| Max drawdown | FCG XOP | -11.69%-10.14% | -19.59%-18.50% | -29.46%-34.97% | -33.27%-34.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCG XOP | 37d27d | 207d143d | 679d690d | 1353d690d |
Trading data
FCG | XOP | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.12 | $201.69 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $31.05 | $196.87 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.12 | $201.69 |
| 1D performance | +3.45% | +2.45% |
| AuM | $683.62 M | $4.51 B |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
FCG | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index | S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2007 | June 19, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FCG
USA
91.8%
Other
8.2%
XOP
USA
97.28%
Other
2.72%
Sectors
FCG
Energy
99.78%
Other
0.22%
XOP
Energy
87.59%
Other
12.41%
Advertisement
Diversification
FCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.43%
XOP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.89%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FCG
ConocoPhillips
4.75%
Western Midstream Partners LP
4.61%
Hess Midstream LP
4.32%
EOG Resources, Inc.
4.31%
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
4.07%
Permian Resources Corp.
4.06%
Devon Energy Corp.
3.95%
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
3.90%
Ovintiv, Inc.
3.78%
APA Corp.
3.75%
Expand Energy Corp.
3.63%
EQT Corp.
3.52%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.32%
SM Energy Co.
3.32%
Range Resources Corp.
3.14%
XOP
PBF Energy, Inc.
3.81%
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
3.35%
HF Sinclair Corp.
3.19%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
3.15%
Valero Energy Corp.
3.09%
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
3.08%
Phillips 66
3.01%
Permian Resources Corp.
2.62%
Crescent Energy Co.
2.60%
Calumet, Inc.
2.52%
APA Corp.
2.52%
Ovintiv, Inc.
2.52%
SM Energy Co.
2.51%
Expand Energy Corp.
2.46%
ConocoPhillips
2.45%
Frequently asked questions about FCG and XOP
How have the FCG and XOP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 22, 2026, FCG is up 34.96% year-to-date (YTD), while XOP has returned 61.76%. That puts XOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCG or XOP?
Year-to-date, the FCG ETF saw +$95M in flows, compared to +$1.39B for XOP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCG or XOP?
Over the past year, FCG had a volatility of 27.42%, while XOP experienced 28.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCG or XOP?
As of October 22, 2026, FCG holds $683.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while XOP manages $4.51 B.
What sectors do the FCG and XOP ETFs invest in?
FCG leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, XOP focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the FCG ETF and XOP ETF?
FCG top holdings include ConocoPhillips, Western Midstream Partners LP and Hess Midstream LP. XOP holds in its top three: PBF Energy, Inc., Delek US Holdings, Inc. and HF Sinclair Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FCG or XOP?
FCG holds 42 securities with 58.43% of its assets in the top 15. XOP has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.89%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FCG & XOP
MoneyShow Chart of the Day 9/16/26: Oil? Surging. Oil Stocks? Not So Much.
September 16, 2026
XOP
ETF Comparison: State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Versus State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)
January 27, 2026
XOP
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
November 6, 2024
XOP
Advertisement
Advertisement
