Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FCGvsPXEETF Comparison
First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Energy and Utilities. FCG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.61% for PXE. FCG is up 24.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$101M in YTD flows. PXE performs better with 27.25% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCG and PXE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FCG vs PXE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCG PXE | +8.94%+8.98% | +20.13%+19.76% | +24.30%+27.25% | +28.86%+34.08% | +44.54%+46.50% | +135.52%+150.15% |
| Flows | FCG PXE | +$68M+$74K | +$100M-$3M | +$101M-$4M | +$165M-$14M | -$53M-$114M | +$215M-$46M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCG PXE | +27.36%+28.45% | +32.72%+33.49% | +27.54%+28.00% | +34.33%+33.93% |
| Max drawdown | FCG PXE | -6.53%-7.55% | -23.18%-23.62% | -29.46%-37.59% | -33.27%-37.59% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCG PXE | 40d48d | 244d71d | 679d703d | 1353d703d |
FCG | PXE | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.38 | $35.90 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $29.11 | $35.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FCG | PXE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FCG | PXE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.38 | $35.90 |
| 1D performance | +0.93% | +0.87% |
| AuM | $664.87 M | $91.05 M |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.61% |
FCG | PXE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index | Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production Intellidex Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 29 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2007 | October 26, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FCG and PXE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FCG is up 24.3% year-to-date (YTD), while PXE has returned 27.25%. That puts PXE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCG or PXE?
Year-to-date, the FCG ETF saw +$101M in flows, compared to -$4M for PXE.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCG or PXE?
Over the past year, FCG had a volatility of 32.72%, while PXE experienced 33.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCG or PXE?
As of March 11, 2026, FCG holds $664.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while PXE manages $91.05 M.
What sectors do the FCG and PXE ETFs invest in?
FCG leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, PXE focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the FCG ETF and PXE ETF?
FCG top holdings include CONOCOPHILLIPS, OCCIDENTAL U and DIAMONDBACK ENERGY. PXE holds in its top three: DEVON ENERGY, OCCIDENTAL U and PHILLIPS 66.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCG or PXE?
FCG holds 36 securities with 61.83% of its assets in the top 15. PXE has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.46%.
Natural Gas Futures Plunge Due to Milder Weather and Reduced LNG Exports | ETFs to Watch
War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers
Natural Gas Dead Cat Bounce Amid Oversupply
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
Natural gas is here to stay: 2 ETFs to add to your watchlist
Natural gas is here to stay: 2 ETFs to add to your watchlist
European energy crisis - ETFs to speculate and hedge with
ETF winners and losers within the U.S. in 2022 (so far)
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
