Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FCGvsLNGXETF Comparison
First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Energy and Utilities. FCG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.45% for LNGX. FCG is up 24.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$101M in YTD flows. LNGX performs worse with 22.01% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCG and LNGX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FCG vs LNGX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCG LNGX | +8.94%+8.41% | +20.13%+19.32% | +24.30%+22.01% | +28.86%n/a | +44.54%n/a | +135.52%n/a |
| Flows | FCG LNGX | +$68M+$13M | +$100M+$27M | +$101M+$26M | +$165M- | -$53M- | +$215M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCG LNGX | +27.36%+23.68% | +32.72%n/a | +27.54%n/a | +34.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FCG LNGX | -6.53%-5.05% | -23.18%n/a | -29.46%n/a | -33.27%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FCG LNGX | 40d40d | 244dn/a | 679dn/a | 1353dn/a |
FCG | LNGX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:25 PM | $29.50 | $44.21 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $29.11 | $43.61 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FCG | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FCG | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.50 | $44.21 |
| 1D performance | +1.32% | +1.38% |
| AuM | $664.87 M | $35.27 M |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.45% |
FCG | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Global X |
| Benchmark | ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index | Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 32 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2007 | October 28, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FCG and LNGX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FCG is up 24.3% year-to-date (YTD), while LNGX has returned 22.01%. That puts FCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCG or LNGX?
Year-to-date, the FCG ETF saw +$101M in flows, compared to +$26M for LNGX.
Which ETF is bigger: FCG or LNGX?
As of March 11, 2026, FCG holds $664.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while LNGX manages $35.27 M.
What sectors do the FCG and LNGX ETFs invest in?
FCG leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, LNGX focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the FCG ETF and LNGX ETF?
FCG top holdings include CONOCOPHILLIPS, OCCIDENTAL U and DIAMONDBACK ENERGY. LNGX holds in its top three: COTERRA ENERGY, EQT and CHESAPEAKE ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCG or LNGX?
FCG holds 36 securities with 61.83% of its assets in the top 15. LNGX has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.56%.
Natural Gas Futures Plunge Due to Milder Weather and Reduced LNG Exports | ETFs to Watch
Natural Gas Dead Cat Bounce Amid Oversupply
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
Natural gas is here to stay: 2 ETFs to add to your watchlist
European energy crisis - ETFs to speculate and hedge with
European energy crisis - ETFs to speculate and hedge with
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.