FBYvsQQQIETF Comparison
VS
YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. FBY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.06%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. FBY is down -7.49% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 9.85% YTD performance, and +$8.00B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FBY and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FBY vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FBY QQQI | -11.86%-4.25% | +0.96%+2.12% | -7.49%+9.85% | -16.68%+11.17% | +52.97%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FBY QQQI | -$5M+$835M | +$2M+$1.92B | +$1M+$8.00B | +$6M+$9.65B | +$214M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FBY QQQI | +39.10%+16.10% | +35.42%+17.04% | +30.44%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FBY QQQI | -15.35%-6.10% | -27.53%-9.62% | -31.56%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FBY QQQI | 29d17d | 359d76d | 175dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
FBY | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $8.16 | $53.17 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $8.27 | $52.59 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FBY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $8.16 | $53.17 |
| 1D performance | -1.33% | +1.10% |
| AuM | $100.31 M | $15.04 B |
| E/R | 1.06% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
FBY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | YieldMax ETFs | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 28, 2023 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FBY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FBY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FBY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
FBY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FBY and QQQI
How have the FBY and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, FBY is down -7.49% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 9.85%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FBY or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the FBY ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$8.00B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: FBY or QQQI?
Over the past year, FBY had a volatility of 35.42%, while QQQI experienced 17.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: FBY or QQQI?
As of October 23, 2026, FBY holds $100.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $15.04 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about FBY & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
A Tale of Two Communication Services Giants
April 29, 2024
FBY
A Tale of Two Communication Services Giants
April 29, 2024
FBY
Advertisement
