Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EFFIvsEFAETF Comparison
Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF
Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF (EFFI) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Health Care. EFFI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.32% for EFA. EFFI is down -0.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. EFA performs better with 1.35% YTD performance, and +$354M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EFFI and EFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EFFI vs EFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EFFI EFA | -4.26%-6.41% | +0.95%+2.74% | -0.37%+1.35% | +22.98%+21.79% | n/a+56.78% | n/a+49.60% |
| Flows | EFFI EFA | +$924K- | +$1M+$1.20B | +$1M+$354M | +$2M+$3.17B | -+$4.95B | -+$2.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EFFI EFA | +13.70%+15.11% | +15.51%+16.37% | n/a+14.23% | n/a+15.77% |
| Max drawdown | EFFI EFA | -7.44%-7.90% | -13.94%-13.68% | n/a-13.68% | n/a-29.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | EFFI EFA | 10d15d | 37d41d | n/a41d | n/a892d |
EFFI | EFA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.48 | $96.30 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $23.81 | $97.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EFFI | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EFFI | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.48 | $96.30 |
| 1D performance | -1.37% | -1.19% |
| AuM | $134.19 M | $71.70 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.32% |
EFFI | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Harbor Capital | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 76 | 657 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2024 | August 14, 2001 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EFFI and EFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EFFI is down -0.37% year-to-date (YTD), while EFA has returned 1.35%. That puts EFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EFFI or EFA?
Year-to-date, the EFFI ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$354M for EFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EFFI or EFA?
Over the past year, EFFI had a volatility of 15.51%, while EFA experienced 16.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: EFFI or EFA?
As of March 11, 2026, EFFI holds $134.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFA manages $71.70 B.
What sectors do the EFFI and EFA ETFs invest in?
EFFI leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, EFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the EFFI ETF and EFA ETF?
EFFI top holdings include L OREAL S.A., MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG and TOYOTA TSUSHO. EFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: EFFI or EFA?
EFFI holds 77 securities with 44.12% of its assets in the top 15. EFA has 695 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.62%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
Beyond Borders: Harbor Launches Two New Global Equity ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
