New

Create, analyze, optimize your ETF portfolio. Start now →

Smart Investing

Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?

Some international equity ETFs accept foreign exchange fluctuations, while others try to mitigate them. Here’s an overview of the practical effects of that decision for investors.

Share
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?

Keep up with what matters in ETFs

Get timely ETF insights, market trends, and top ideas straight to your inbox.

Your newsletter subscriptions with us are subject to ETF Central's Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

When you buy an equity ETF, there are several forces working together to drive returns. At the most basic level, the underlying stocks can rise or fall based on earnings growth, changes in valuation, dividends, and broader economic conditions.

Even if nothing dramatic happens at the company level, prices can still move as investors reassess risk, rotate between sectors, or react to interest-rate changes. These drivers apply to equity ETFs everywhere, whether the fund owns U.S., Canadian, or international stocks.

Where things start to differ is when those stocks trade outside your home market and are priced in a foreign currency. In that case, your ETF’s return is no longer determined solely by how the companies perform. It is also affected by how the foreign currency moves relative to your own.

ETF providers are well aware of this dynamic. That is why, for some international equity strategies, you may find two versions of the same ETF: one that leaves currency exposure unhedged and another that actively hedges foreign exchange fluctuations back to the investor’s home currency.

The idea behind hedging is straightforward. By neutralizing currency movements, the ETF aims to deliver returns that more closely reflect the performance of the underlying stocks alone. The question is whether that added complexity is worth it.

Many of the most widely used international equity ETFs from large providers like Vanguard and iShares do not hedge currency exposure, even though hedged alternatives exist. Should investors follow suit, or does hedging make sense in certain environments?

In the sections that follow, we’ll walk through how currency risk works in practice, why it exists, and how it has affected international equity returns historically, using some ETF examples.

ETF Central Weekly Newsletter

Like what you're reading?

Stay in the loop — get the latest ETF insights: trends, analysis, and expert picks.

After signing up, you will receive occasional emails from ETF Central and its partners. See our Terms of use.

What is Currency Risk in ETF Investing?

Imagine an ETF that trades in U.S. dollars but holds stocks from the European Union, where those companies trade in euros. When you buy the ETF, you are using U.S. dollars. Behind the scenes, the ETF issuer uses those dollars to gain exposure to European equities, which means euros are involved in the process even though you never personally exchange currencies.

This creates a situation where two currencies matter at the same time. The performance of the underlying stocks is one factor, but the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the euro is another. The ETF’s return reflects the combination of both.

  1. All else being equal, if the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to the euro, the ETF will tend to underperform. That happens because the euro-denominated stock gains are worth fewer U.S. dollars once they are translated back into the ETF’s trading currency. Even if European stocks rise in local terms, a stronger dollar can offset part or all of that gain when measured in U.S. dollars.
  2. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar weakens against the euro, the ETF can outperform. In that case, the same euro-denominated stock prices translate into more U.S. dollars. Even modest local market returns can look stronger once currency effects are added on top. This is why investors sometimes see positive ETF returns even when foreign markets appear flat in headlines.

Over long periods, currency effects often tend to balance out. Exchange rates are difficult to forecast, and sustained trends are hard to predict with consistency. Despite frequent narratives about de-dollarization, or alternative reserve currencies, the U.S. dollar has remained strong relative to many major currencies in recent years and continues to function as the world’s primary reserve currency.

Currency Hedging in ETFs: EFA and DBEF

To illustrate how currency hedging can affect long-term performance results, it helps to look at two ETFs that hold the same underlying stocks but treat currency exposure differently.

The first is the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

. With a 0.32% expense ratio, EFA tracks roughly 900 stocks across Europe, Australia, Asia, and the Far East. It has been a core international equity option in the iShares lineup since August 2001. It is also one of the most widely used international equity ETFs, with more than $70 billion in assets under management.

The comparison point is the Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF

. DBEF owns the same underlying basket of EAFE stocks, but its benchmark is structured to hedge U.S. dollar currency exposure. That hedge slightly increases costs, with an expense ratio of 0.35%, but the fund is still large and liquid, with approximately $8.55 billion in assets.

Looking at a 14.5-year backtest from June 9, 2011, to December 15, 2025, the performance difference is striking. Over that period, DBEF delivered a cumulative return of 286.12%, translating to an annualized return of 9.75%. EFA, by contrast, posted a cumulative return of 147.74% and an annualized return of 6.45%.

EFA vs DBEF ETF Performance

The gap reflects the broader currency environment during that time. The U.S. dollar experienced extended periods of strength, particularly against the euro.

Because EFA leaves foreign exchange exposure intact, euro and yen weakness reduced U.S. dollar–based returns even when local equity markets performed reasonably well. DBEF, by hedging that currency exposure using derivatives, neutralized that effect. As a result, its returns more closely reflected the performance of the underlying companies.

In short, if an investor has a strong conviction that the U.S. dollar will weaken over time, remaining unhedged may be preferable. On the other hand, investors who want their international equity allocation to reflect stock performance alone, without currency fluctuations helping or hurting returns, may prefer a hedged option like DBEF.

Please note this article is for information purposes only and does not in any way constitute investment advice. It is essential that you seek advice from a registered financial professional prior to making any investment decision.

Advertisement
ETF U
Become a better investor with NYSE: The Home of ETFs
Visit the ETF U homepage
ETF Guides
Advertisement

Recent educational content

Investors Can Fight Healthcare Inflation with Newly Launched ETFs

Asset TV

The ETF Show - Investors Can Fight Healthcare Inflation with Newly Launched ETFs

Adam Schenck, Principal and Managing Director of Fund Services at Milliman joined The ETF Show to discuss Milliman's first ETFs designed to hedge against rising healthcare inflation.

Asset TV
By Asset TV · April 22, 2026
Tidal ETF Industry KPIs

ETF Trends

ETF Industry KPIs April 20, 2026

The ETF Industry saw 14 New Launches, 1 Ticker Change and 16 closures last week.

Tidal
By Tidal · April 22, 2026
The ETF Show - Investors Run to Cash Alternatives as Markets Remain Volatile

Asset TV

The ETF Show - Investors Run to Cash Alternatives as Markets Remain Volatile

Jason England, Portfolio Manager and Fixed Income Strategist from Simplify joined The ETF Show to discuss investor allocations to fixed income as markets continue on their rollercoaster ride.

Asset TV
By Asset TV · April 15, 2026
Tidal ETF Industry KPIs

ETF Trends

ETF Industry KPIs March 30, 2026

The ETF Industry saw 33 New Launches, 1 Ticker Change and 9 closures last week.

Tidal
By Tidal · March 31, 2026

Browse all educational columns

Advertisement
Webcast on Demand

Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution

Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.

Accepted for 1 CE Credit

Calamos Webcast