Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EATZvsXRTETF Comparison
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Discretionary. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples. EATZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.97%, versus 0.35% for XRT. EATZ is up 3.04% year-to-date (YTD) with -$411K in YTD flows. XRT performs worse with -4.1% YTD performance, and +$45M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EATZ and XRT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EATZ vs XRT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EATZ XRT | -3.39%-6.29% | +2.90%-7.66% | +3.04%-4.10% | -0.48%+19.53% | +41.20%+38.45% | n/a-5.14% |
| Flows | EATZ XRT | --$220M | -$137K+$7M | -$411K+$45M | -$650K+$100M | -$729K+$6M | --$107M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EATZ XRT | +17.37%+17.48% | +21.78%+24.94% | +19.43%+22.60% | n/a+27.09% |
| Max drawdown | EATZ XRT | -5.77%-10.02% | -23.37%-13.05% | -23.37%-25.60% | n/a-44.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | EATZ XRT | 54d55d | 247d37d | 247d244d | n/a1576d |
EATZ | XRT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.11 | $80.26 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $26.71 | $81.74 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EATZ | XRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EATZ | XRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.11 | $80.26 |
| 1D performance | -2.25% | -1.81% |
| AuM | $2.55 M | $494.86 M |
| E/R | 2.97% | 0.35% |
EATZ | XRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | SPDR |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Retail Select Industry Index |
| N° of holdings | 17 | 72 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 20, 2021 | June 19, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EATZ and XRT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, EATZ is up 3.04% year-to-date (YTD), while XRT has lost -4.1%. That puts EATZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EATZ or XRT?
Year-to-date, the EATZ ETF saw -$411K in flows, compared to +$45M for XRT.
Which ETF is more volatile: EATZ or XRT?
Over the past year, EATZ had a volatility of 21.78%, while XRT experienced 24.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: EATZ or XRT?
As of March 10, 2026, EATZ holds $2.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while XRT manages $494.86 M.
What sectors do the EATZ and XRT ETFs invest in?
EATZ leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, XRT focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the EATZ ETF and XRT ETF?
EATZ top holdings include BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and DUTCH BROS. XRT holds in its top three: CAMPING WORLD HOLDINGS, DOLLAR GENERAL and CASEYS GENERAL STORES.
Which ETF is more diversified: EATZ or XRT?
EATZ holds 17 securities with 71.05% of its assets in the top 15. XRT has 73 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.24%.
Ask the Manager: Why the Restaurant Industry Deserves a Look
There's an ETF for That? Black Friday & Cyber Monday Retail
2023 Holiday Outlook: Retail ETFs to Keep on Your Watchlist
Analyzing the Potential ETF Winners & Losers from The Weight-Loss Drug Craze
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
