CTEXvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. CTEX's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Utilities. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. CTEX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.38% for ICLN. CTEX is down -7.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35K in YTD flows. ICLN performs better with 9.6% YTD performance, and +$163M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CTEX and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CTEX vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CTEX ICLN | -8.12%-1.41% | -22.60%-12.89% | -7.68%+9.60% | +19.97%+23.45% | +22.48%+20.86% | n/a-16.57% |
| Flows | CTEX ICLN | -+$112M | --$482M | +$35K+$163M | +$3M+$289M | +$487K-$1.11B | --$1.98B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CTEX ICLN | +47.02%+31.05% | +46.98%+28.90% | +42.71%+24.58% | n/a+26.57% |
| Max drawdown | CTEX ICLN | -31.26%-21.80% | -39.02%-28.47% | -45.08%-31.13% | n/a-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | CTEX ICLN | 81d81d | 101d101d | 721d631d | n/a1775d |
Trading data
CTEX | ICLN | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.47 | $17.92 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $32.28 | $17.82 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CTEX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CTEX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.47 | $17.92 |
| 1D performance | +0.59% | +0.56% |
| AuM | $4.89 M | $2.15 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.38% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CTEX
USA
76.48%
Other
23.52%
ICLN
USA
36.76%
China
22.42%
Other
40.81%
Sectors
CTEX
Industrials
60.84%
Non-Energy Materi.
14.56%
Utilities
10.5%
Technology
8.36%
Other
5.74%
ICLN
Industrials
48.56%
Utilities
41.75%
Technology
7.31%
Other
2.39%
Advertisement
Diversification
CTEX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.4%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.72%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CTEX
Arcosa, Inc.
5.50%
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
5.50%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
4.49%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.35%
First Solar, Inc.
4.11%
Canadian Solar, Inc.
3.86%
ReNew Energy Global Plc
3.67%
Nextpower, Inc.
3.62%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
3.61%
Generac Holdings, Inc.
3.58%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
3.51%
Hyster-Yale, Inc.
3.50%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
3.47%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.36%
Valmont Industries, Inc.
3.27%
ICLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.92%
First Solar, Inc.
7.85%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.54%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.96%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.56%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.70%
EDP SA
2.68%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.46%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.35%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
2.22%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.00%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.91%
Ørsted A/S
1.62%
Frequently asked questions about CTEX and ICLN
How have the CTEX and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, CTEX is down -7.68% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 9.6%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CTEX or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the CTEX ETF saw +$35K in flows, compared to +$163M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: CTEX or ICLN?
Over the past year, CTEX had a volatility of 46.98%, while ICLN experienced 28.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: CTEX or ICLN?
As of September 11, 2026, CTEX holds $4.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.15 B.
What sectors do the CTEX and ICLN ETFs invest in?
CTEX leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Utilities. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CTEX ETF and ICLN ETF?
CTEX top holdings include Arcosa, Inc., FuelCell Energy, Inc. and Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.. ICLN holds in its top three: China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CTEX or ICLN?
CTEX holds 30 securities with 59.4% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.72%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CTEX & ICLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
ICLN
Advertisement
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
October 18, 2022
ICLN
Looking for a way to invest in clean tech?
September 21, 2022
CTEX
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
September 20, 2022
ICLN
Advertisement
