Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CLIXvsDBMFETF Comparison
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and iMGP DBi MANAGED FUTURES STRATEGY ETF (DBMF) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CLIX's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. CLIX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.85% for DBMF. CLIX is down -11.86% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. DBMF performs better with 9.89% YTD performance, and +$972M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLIX and DBMF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CLIX vs DBMF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLIX DBMF | +5.39%+0.90% | -10.19%+10.61% | -11.86%+9.89% | +14.69%+31.39% | +75.48%+33.84% | -38.16%+52.54% |
| Flows | CLIX DBMF | -+$786M | -+$1.12B | -+$972M | -$3M+$1.79B | -$12M+$2.19B | -$151M+$3.19B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLIX DBMF | +22.45%+16.71% | +22.56%+11.74% | +21.24%+10.65% | +27.11%+12.12% |
| Max drawdown | CLIX DBMF | -19.57%-3.60% | -19.57%-4.96% | -21.25%-15.75% | -68.50%-19.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | CLIX DBMF | 60d10d | 60d9d | 109d489d | 1822d1155d |
CLIX | DBMF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.22 | $30.66 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $53.06 | $30.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CLIX | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CLIX | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.22 | $30.66 |
| 1D performance | +0.30% | -0.78% |
| AuM | $6.66 M | $3.28 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.85% |
CLIX | DBMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | ProShares | iMGP Funds |
| Benchmark | ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 15 | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 14, 2017 | May 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CLIX and DBMF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CLIX is down -11.86% year-to-date (YTD), while DBMF has returned 9.89%. That puts DBMF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLIX or DBMF?
Year-to-date, the CLIX ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$972M for DBMF.
Which ETF is more volatile: CLIX or DBMF?
Over the past year, CLIX had a volatility of 22.56%, while DBMF experienced 11.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: CLIX or DBMF?
As of March 13, 2026, CLIX holds $6.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBMF manages $3.28 B.
ETF Strategies Explained for Dummies (With Examples)
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
DBMF: A top ETF outperformer in 2022
A short primer to Hedge Fund ETFs
A short primer to Hedge Fund ETFs
Managed Futures ETFs: Diversifying investment portfolios
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
