CATHvsQQQETF Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. In contrast, QQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. CATH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.18% for QQQ. CATH is up 10.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$153M in YTD flows. QQQ performs better with 15.07% YTD performance, and +$5.40B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CATH and QQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CATH vs QQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CATH QQQ | -0.78%-4.96% | +3.24%+1.86% | +10.38%+15.07% | +11.77%+15.88% | +81.56%+101.37% | +68.06%+92.02% |
| Flows | CATH QQQ | +$14M-$1.01B | +$59M+$8.13B | +$153M+$5.40B | +$152M+$13.17B | +$159M+$62.58B | +$317M+$76.21B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CATH QQQ | +11.19%+18.94% | +12.96%+19.97% | +15.24%+20.58% | +17.55%+23.11% |
| Max drawdown | CATH QQQ | -3.45%-7.26% | -9.42%-11.93% | -19.35%-22.83% | -26.22%-35.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | CATH QQQ | 71d17d | 92d167d | 126d124d | 713d714d |
CATH | QQQ | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $91.03 | $712.20 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $90.49 | $704.40 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CATH | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CATH | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $91.03 | $712.20 |
| 1D performance | +0.60% | +1.11% |
| AuM | $1.37 B | $471.53 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
