AFSCvsIWMETF Comparison
VS
abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. AFSC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, IWM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. AFSC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.09%, versus 0.19% for IWM. AFSC is up 19.18% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. IWM performs worse with 13.23% YTD performance, and -$7.81B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AFSC and IWM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
AFSC vs IWM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AFSC IWM | -1.60%-1.04% | -4.03%-5.19% | +19.18%+13.23% | +18.15%+11.79% | n/a+74.44% | n/a+29.33% |
| Flows | AFSC IWM | --$1.20B | +$21K-$137M | -$6M-$7.81B | -$17M-$3.82B | --$3.10B | --$7.65B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AFSC IWM | +14.29%+14.00% | +18.25%+18.21% | n/a+21.10% | n/a+22.45% |
| Max drawdown | AFSC IWM | -9.91%-11.10% | -10.27%-11.10% | n/a-27.52% | n/a-31.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | AFSC IWM | 70d71d | 39d71d | n/a289d | n/a1093d |
Trading data
AFSC | IWM | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.26 | $279.74 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $36.10 | $276.99 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
AFSC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexAFSC | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
AFSC | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.26 | $279.74 |
| 1D performance | +0.44% | +0.99% |
| AuM | $9.56 M | $74.60 B |
| E/R | 1.09% | 0.19% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
AFSC
USA
89.02%
Other
10.98%
IWM
USA
94.99%
Other
5.01%
Sectors
AFSC
Finance
24.04%
Healthcare
18.96%
Industrials
13.68%
Technology
13.37%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.6%
Other
22.36%
IWM
Finance
26.05%
Healthcare
20.69%
Technology
11.8%
Industrials
10.33%
Other
31.12%
Advertisement
Diversification
AFSC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.66%
IWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
AFSC
American Healthcare REIT, Inc.
3.45%
Brinker International, Inc.
3.40%
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
3.36%
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals International Plc
3.36%
Quaker Houghton
3.24%
Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida
2.93%
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
2.87%
Impinj, Inc.
2.82%
Ameris Bancorp
2.77%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp.
2.74%
Wintrust Financial Corp.
2.69%
PJT Partners, Inc.
2.65%
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
2.63%
AZZ, Inc.
2.44%
Banner Corp.
2.32%
IWM
JFrog Ltd.
0.35%
Moog, Inc.
0.34%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.34%
Glaukos Corp.
0.33%
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.33%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.32%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.30%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.30%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.30%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.29%
Old National Bancorp
0.29%
SM Energy Co.
0.29%
Twist Bioscience Corp.
0.28%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.28%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.28%
Frequently asked questions about AFSC and IWM
How have the AFSC and IWM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, AFSC is up 19.18% year-to-date (YTD), while IWM has returned 13.23%. That puts AFSC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AFSC or IWM?
Year-to-date, the AFSC ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$7.81B for IWM.
Which ETF is more volatile: AFSC or IWM?
Over the past year, AFSC had a volatility of 18.25%, while IWM experienced 18.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: AFSC or IWM?
As of October 26, 2026, AFSC holds $9.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWM manages $74.60 B.
What sectors do the AFSC and IWM ETFs invest in?
AFSC leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the AFSC ETF and IWM ETF?
AFSC top holdings include American Healthcare REIT, Inc., Brinker International, Inc. and Merit Medical Systems, Inc.. IWM holds in its top three: JFrog Ltd., Moog, Inc. and UMB Financial Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: AFSC or IWM?
AFSC holds 43 securities with 43.66% of its assets in the top 15. IWM has 1953 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about AFSC & IWM
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (October 19-23, 2026)
October 26, 2026
IWM
ETF Comparison: NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) Versus Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)
September 25, 2026
IWM
Advertisement
Advertisement
