ZALTvsDIVOETF Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. ZALT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.56% for DIVO. ZALT is up 6.19% year-to-date (YTD) with +$153M in YTD flows. DIVO performs better with 11.4% YTD performance, and +$1.73B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ZALT and DIVO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ZALT vs DIVO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZALT DIVO | +0.93%+2.03% | +1.65%+3.64% | +6.19%+11.40% | +8.87%+16.33% | +33.86%+60.32% | n/a+70.24% |
| Flows | ZALT DIVO | +$33M+$113M | +$137M+$375M | +$153M+$1.73B | +$137M+$2.24B | +$706M+$3.73B | -+$5.98B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ZALT DIVO | +4.55%+8.36% | +4.01%+9.37% | +5.87%+10.63% | n/a+11.80% |
| Max drawdown | ZALT DIVO | -1.02%-4.23% | -1.78%-5.92% | -8.22%-12.14% | n/a-13.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | ZALT DIVO | 15d43d | 41d114d | 84d130d | n/a329d |
ZALT | DIVO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.58 | $47.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $34.75 | $47.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
ZALT | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.58 | $47.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $823.34 M | $8.01 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.56% |
ZALT | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 2, 2023 | December 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |