Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XYLDvsXDIVETF Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Roundhill S&P 500 No Dividend Target ETF (XDIV) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. XYLD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.215% for XDIV. XYLD is up 1.37% year-to-date (YTD) with -$41M in YTD flows. XDIV performs worse with -0.72% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XYLD and XDIV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XYLD vs XDIV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XYLD XDIV | -0.21%-2.18% | +2.63%-1.20% | +1.37%-0.72% | +13.92%n/a | +42.70%n/a | +46.72%n/a |
| Flows | XYLD XDIV | -$39M+$2M | +$47M+$15M | -$41M+$8M | -$77M- | +$715M- | +$3.29B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XYLD XDIV | +7.27%+11.38% | +13.91%n/a | +10.25%n/a | +11.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XYLD XDIV | -1.68%-3.32% | -10.81%n/a | -15.54%n/a | -18.52%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XYLD XDIV | 13d41d | 90dn/a | 240dn/a | 693dn/a |
XYLD | XDIV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.51 | |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $40.49 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XYLD | XDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XYLD | XDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.51 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | – |
| AuM | $3.11 B | $35.17 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.215% |
XYLD | XDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | Roundhill Investments |
| Benchmark | CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 539 | 479 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 21, 2013 | July 10, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XYLD and XDIV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, XYLD is up 1.37% year-to-date (YTD), while XDIV has lost -0.72%. That puts XYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XYLD or XDIV?
Year-to-date, the XYLD ETF saw -$41M in flows, compared to +$8M for XDIV.
Which ETF is bigger: XYLD or XDIV?
As of March 10, 2026, XYLD holds $3.11 B in assets under management (AUM), while XDIV manages $35.17 M.
What sectors do the XYLD and XDIV ETFs invest in?
XYLD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, XDIV focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the XYLD ETF and XDIV ETF?
XYLD top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XDIV holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: XYLD or XDIV?
XYLD holds 577 securities with 44.67% of its assets in the top 15. XDIV has 505 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.91%.
Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 2: Covered Call ETFs
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 1: A Grand Overview
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
Rohan Reddy with Global X
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.