Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XOPvsRSPGETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. XOP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.4% for RSPG. XOP is up 30.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$826M in YTD flows. RSPG performs worse with 28.6% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XOP and RSPG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XOP vs RSPG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XOP RSPG | +10.42%+6.46% | +24.73%+24.52% | +30.40%+28.60% | +37.15%+36.53% | +43.21%+66.37% | +103.15%+166.67% |
| Flows | XOP RSPG | +$731M-$33M | +$852M+$16M | +$826M+$7M | +$432M-$65M | -$1.19B-$159M | -$3.08B+$82M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XOP RSPG | +28.96%+22.85% | +33.69%+27.80% | +28.17%+23.39% | +34.80%+28.59% |
| Max drawdown | XOP RSPG | -6.12%-5.44% | -23.80%-21.08% | -34.97%-23.04% | -34.97%-28.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | XOP RSPG | 40d22d | 75d222d | 690d415d | 690d429d |
XOP | RSPG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:34 PM | $165.87 | $102.34 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $164.69 | $99.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XOP | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XOP | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $165.87 | $102.34 |
| 1D performance | +0.72% | +2.44% |
| AuM | $3.23 B | $567.08 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.4% |
XOP | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index | S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 22 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 19, 2006 | November 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XOP and RSPG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, XOP is up 30.4% year-to-date (YTD), while RSPG has returned 28.6%. That puts XOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XOP or RSPG?
Year-to-date, the XOP ETF saw +$826M in flows, compared to +$7M for RSPG.
Which ETF is more volatile: XOP or RSPG?
Over the past year, XOP had a volatility of 33.69%, while RSPG experienced 27.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: XOP or RSPG?
As of March 11, 2026, XOP holds $3.23 B in assets under management (AUM), while RSPG manages $567.08 M.
What sectors do the XOP and RSPG ETFs invest in?
XOP leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, RSPG focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the XOP ETF and RSPG ETF?
XOP top holdings include US92333F1012, EXXON and TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORP. RSPG holds in its top three: SCHLUMBERGER, HALLIBURTON and BAKER HUGHES.
Which ETF is more diversified: XOP or RSPG?
XOP holds 50 securities with 42.96% of its assets in the top 15. RSPG has 22 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.91%.
ETF Comparison: State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Versus State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Benefit Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
Energy Sector Plummets on Fed Comments and Crude Oil Stocks
War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
