Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XOPvsLNGXETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. XOP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.45% for LNGX. XOP is up 30.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$826M in YTD flows. LNGX performs worse with 22.01% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XOP and LNGX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XOP vs LNGX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XOP LNGX | +10.42%+8.41% | +24.73%+19.32% | +30.40%+22.01% | +37.15%n/a | +43.21%n/a | +103.15%n/a |
| Flows | XOP LNGX | +$731M+$13M | +$852M+$27M | +$826M+$26M | +$432M- | -$1.19B- | -$3.08B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XOP LNGX | +28.96%+23.68% | +33.69%n/a | +28.17%n/a | +34.80%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XOP LNGX | -6.12%-5.05% | -23.80%n/a | -34.97%n/a | -34.97%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XOP LNGX | 40d40d | 75dn/a | 690dn/a | 690dn/a |
XOP | LNGX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $164.69 | $43.61 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $159.00 | $42.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XOP | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XOP | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $164.69 | $43.61 |
| 1D performance | +3.58% | +3.10% |
| AuM | $3.23 B | $35.27 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.45% |
XOP | LNGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Global X |
| Benchmark | S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index | Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 32 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 19, 2006 | October 28, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XOP and LNGX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, XOP is up 30.4% year-to-date (YTD), while LNGX has returned 22.01%. That puts XOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XOP or LNGX?
Year-to-date, the XOP ETF saw +$826M in flows, compared to +$26M for LNGX.
Which ETF is bigger: XOP or LNGX?
As of March 11, 2026, XOP holds $3.23 B in assets under management (AUM), while LNGX manages $35.27 M.
What sectors do the XOP and LNGX ETFs invest in?
XOP leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, LNGX focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the XOP ETF and LNGX ETF?
XOP top holdings include US92333F1012, EXXON and TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORP. LNGX holds in its top three: COTERRA ENERGY, EQT and CHESAPEAKE ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: XOP or LNGX?
XOP holds 50 securities with 42.96% of its assets in the top 15. LNGX has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.56%.
ETF Comparison: State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Versus State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Benefit Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
