Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
XLKvsIYWETF Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) belong to the same industry segment: US Info. Technology. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Information Technology. XLK is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.38% for IYW. XLK is down -2.42% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1.16B in YTD flows. IYW performs worse with -3.49% YTD performance, and -$1.07B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XLK and IYW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XLK vs IYW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XLK IYW | -1.75%-1.46% | -4.93%-5.34% | -2.42%-3.49% | +35.60%+35.66% | +110.29%+133.40% | +120.68%+124.01% |
| Flows | XLK IYW | +$439M-$811M | -$2.00B-$1.07B | -$1.16B-$1.07B | +$1.47B-$5.10B | +$5.92B-$2.66B | +$6.79B-$415M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XLK IYW | +22.75%+21.88% | +26.92%+27.18% | +23.20%+23.38% | +24.77%+25.90% |
| Max drawdown | XLK IYW | -9.11%-8.75% | -17.78%-18.45% | -25.74%-26.59% | -33.57%-39.42% |
| Max drawdown duration | XLK IYW | 42d42d | 45d45d | 113d125d | 534d690d |
XLK | IYW | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:01 PM | $138.69 | $190.14 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $140.43 | $192.67 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
XLK | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
XLK | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $138.69 | $190.14 |
| 1D performance | -1.24% | -1.31% |
| AuM | $89.13 B | $19.21 B |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.38% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the XLK and IYW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, XLK is down -2.42% year-to-date (YTD), while IYW has lost -3.49%. That puts XLK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XLK or IYW?
Year-to-date, the XLK ETF saw -$1.16B in flows, compared to -$1.07B for IYW.
Which ETF is more volatile: XLK or IYW?
Over the past year, XLK had a volatility of 26.92%, while IYW experienced 27.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: XLK or IYW?
As of March 11, 2026, XLK holds $89.13 B in assets under management (AUM), while IYW manages $19.21 B.
What sectors do the XLK and IYW ETFs invest in?
XLK leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, IYW focuses on Information Technology and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the XLK ETF and IYW ETF?
XLK top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IYW holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: XLK or IYW?
XLK holds 70 securities with 71.32% of its assets in the top 15. IYW has 142 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.69%.
Three Things You Need to Know Before Investing in a Passive ETF
ETF Comparison: Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) Versus iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM)
ETF Deep Dive: iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM)
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
Tech ETFs Surge, Led by Nvidia’s Outstanding Performance
May 2024 U.S. Sector ETFs Inflows and Outflows Breakdown
Spotlight on Market Valuations: Sector Comparisons and ETF Opportunities
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
