XJUNvsQQQIETF Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. XJUN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. XJUN is up 6.2% year-to-date (YTD) with -$14M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJUN and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XJUN vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJUN QQQI | +1.30%+0.65% | +2.28%+1.01% | +6.20%+10.72% | +8.22%+14.06% | +36.07%n/a | +51.72%n/a |
| Flows | XJUN QQQI | -$1M+$447M | -$1M+$2.14B | -$14M+$7.55B | -$15M+$9.46B | -$234M- | +$55M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJUN QQQI | +4.17%+16.13% | +3.62%+16.85% | +6.67%n/a | +7.23%n/a |
| Max drawdown | XJUN QQQI | -1.17%-6.64% | -1.96%-9.62% | -8.98%n/a | -8.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | XJUN QQQI | 16d13d | 41d76d | 79dn/a | 79dn/a |
XJUN | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.42 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $45.62 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
XJUN | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.42 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.43% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $139.28 M | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.68% |
XJUN | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2021 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
