XJUNvsDIVOETF Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June (XJUN) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. XJUN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.56% for DIVO. XJUN is up 5.75% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. DIVO performs better with 11.4% YTD performance, and +$1.73B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XJUN and DIVO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
XJUN vs DIVO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XJUN DIVO | +1.04%+2.03% | +2.06%+3.64% | +5.75%+11.40% | +8.09%+16.33% | +35.49%+60.32% | +50.88%+70.24% |
| Flows | XJUN DIVO | -$2M+$113M | -$2M+$375M | -$15M+$1.73B | -$16M+$2.24B | -$235M+$3.73B | +$54M+$5.98B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XJUN DIVO | +4.24%+8.36% | +3.63%+9.37% | +6.67%+10.63% | +7.23%+11.80% |
| Max drawdown | XJUN DIVO | -0.97%-4.23% | -1.96%-5.92% | -8.98%-12.14% | -8.98%-13.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | XJUN DIVO | 15d43d | 41d114d | 79d130d | 79d329d |
XJUN | DIVO | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.52 | $47.77 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $45.42 | $47.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
XJUN | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.52 | $47.77 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | -0.08% |
| AuM | $137.56 M | $8.01 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.56% |
XJUN | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2021 | December 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
