XBJLvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF (XBJL) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. XBJL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. XBJL is up 7.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$56M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 14.32% YTD performance, and -$150M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XBJL and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XBJL vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XBJL QYLD | +0.01%-0.15% | +3.36%+6.67% | +7.64%+14.32% | +9.58%+19.41% | +44.85%+57.06% | +56.52%+49.90% |
| Flows | XBJL QYLD | -+$26M | +$1M+$68M | -$56M-$150M | -$58M-$239M | -$38M+$111M | +$30M+$4.85B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XBJL QYLD | +6.00%+9.60% | +5.27%+11.16% | +8.59%+13.51% | +10.03%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | XBJL QYLD | -1.36%-3.58% | -3.43%-5.84% | -11.41%-19.06% | -11.72%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | XBJL QYLD | 9d10d | 41d39d | 79d239d | 309d771d |
Trading data
XBJL | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.18 | $18.29 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $41.08 | $18.32 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XBJL
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexXBJL | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
XBJL | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.18 | $18.29 |
| 1D performance | +0.24% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $77.22 M | $8.37 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.6% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
XBJL
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
XBJL
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
XBJL
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
XBJL
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about XBJL and QYLD
How have the XBJL and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, XBJL is up 7.64% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 14.32%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XBJL or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the XBJL ETF saw -$56M in flows, compared to -$150M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: XBJL or QYLD?
Over the past year, XBJL had a volatility of 5.27%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: XBJL or QYLD?
As of October 19, 2026, XBJL holds $77.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.37 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about XBJL & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
