XBJAvsQYLDETF Comparison
ETF 1
XBJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.36%
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. XBJA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. XBJA is up 8.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 14.32% YTD performance, and -$150M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of XBJA and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
XBJA vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XBJA QYLD | +0.33%-0.15% | +2.89%+6.67% | +8.98%+14.32% | +10.87%+19.41% | +40.68%+57.06% | n/a+49.90% |
| Flows | XBJA QYLD | -+$26M | +$3M+$68M | -$3M-$150M | -$7M-$239M | -$1M+$111M | -+$4.85B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | XBJA QYLD | +3.25%+9.60% | +5.81%+11.16% | +8.43%+13.51% | n/a+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | XBJA QYLD | -0.73%-3.58% | -5.20%-5.84% | -12.49%-19.06% | n/a-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | XBJA QYLD | 9d10d | 44d39d | 106d239d | n/a771d |
Trading data
XBJA | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 7:56 PM | $34.82 | $18.31 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $34.75 | $18.29 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
XBJA
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexXBJA | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 7:56 PM
Live
Closed
XBJA | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.82 | $18.31 |
| 1D performance | +0.20% | +0.11% |
| AuM | $94.10 M | $8.37 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.6% |
Exposure
Countries
XBJA
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
XBJA
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
XBJA
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
XBJA
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about XBJA and QYLD
How have the XBJA and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, XBJA is up 8.98% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 14.32%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: XBJA or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the XBJA ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$150M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: XBJA or QYLD?
Over the past year, XBJA had a volatility of 5.81%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: XBJA or QYLD?
As of October 19, 2026, XBJA holds $94.10 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.37 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about XBJA & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
