Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
VOTEvsBKLCETF Comparison
TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. VOTE's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, BKLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. VOTE is down -0.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. BKLC performs worse with -0.97% YTD performance, and +$388M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of VOTE and BKLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
VOTE vs BKLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VOTE BKLC | -2.22%-2.17% | -1.79%-1.81% | -0.97%-0.97% | +23.12%+23.39% | +84.64%+89.42% | n/a+86.96% |
| Flows | VOTE BKLC | +$39M+$184M | +$43M+$419M | +$48M+$388M | +$100M+$1.48B | +$207M+$2.27B | -+$3.74B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | VOTE BKLC | +11.66%+11.78% | +18.38%+18.38% | +15.14%+15.12% | n/a+17.53% |
| Max drawdown | VOTE BKLC | -3.45%-3.45% | -13.92%-13.92% | -19.12%-19.17% | n/a-26.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | VOTE BKLC | 43d43d | 45d45d | 126d126d | n/a707d |
VOTE | BKLC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $126.70 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $127.44 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
VOTE | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
VOTE | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $126.70 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.58% |
| AuM | $971.62 M | $5.26 B |
| E/R | 0.05% | 0% |
VOTE | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | TCW | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | Morningstar US Large Cap Select Index | Solactive GBS United States 500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 469 | 470 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 22, 2021 | April 7, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the VOTE and BKLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, VOTE is down -0.97% year-to-date (YTD), while BKLC has lost -0.97%. That puts VOTE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: VOTE or BKLC?
Year-to-date, the VOTE ETF saw +$48M in flows, compared to +$388M for BKLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: VOTE or BKLC?
Over the past year, VOTE had a volatility of 18.38%, while BKLC experienced 18.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: VOTE or BKLC?
As of March 11, 2026, VOTE holds $971.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while BKLC manages $5.26 B.
What sectors do the VOTE and BKLC ETFs invest in?
VOTE leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, BKLC focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the VOTE ETF and BKLC ETF?
VOTE top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. BKLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: VOTE or BKLC?
VOTE holds 490 securities with 43.47% of its assets in the top 15. BKLC has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.93%.
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
Meet the Ultra-Affordable, Zero-Expense Ratio ETFs from BNY Mellon
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
