Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
USAIvsIGFETF Comparison
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF - Distributing
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF - Distributing (USAI) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. USAI's top 3 sector exposures are and Energy. In contrast, IGF's top sector exposures are and Utilities.Industrials, Energy, USAI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.39% for IGF. USAI is up 21.67% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. IGF performs worse with 8.74% YTD performance, and +$290M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of USAI and IGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
USAI vs IGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | USAI IGF | +5.88%-0.90% | +21.78%+9.32% | +21.67%+8.74% | +24.23%+30.82% | +106.16%+59.33% | +168.91%+73.10% |
| Flows | USAI IGF | -+$177M | -$2M+$443M | -$2M+$290M | -$8M+$2.40B | +$13M+$3.99B | +$42M+$4.62B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | USAI IGF | +15.70%+9.83% | +19.93%+11.89% | +17.49%+11.90% | +20.48%+13.21% |
| Max drawdown | USAI IGF | -3.40%-3.66% | -16.04%-8.54% | -18.00%-14.82% | -20.75%-20.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | USAI IGF | 9d10d | 308d14d | 372d321d | 533d747d |
USAI | IGF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $46.10 | $67.04 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $45.58 | $66.83 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
USAI | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
USAI | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.10 | $67.04 |
| 1D performance | +1.14% | +0.31% |
| AuM | $96.76 M | $10.00 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.39% |
USAI | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | American Energy Independence Index | S&P Global Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 68 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2017 | December 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the USAI and IGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, USAI is up 21.67% year-to-date (YTD), while IGF has returned 8.74%. That puts USAI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: USAI or IGF?
Year-to-date, the USAI ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$290M for IGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: USAI or IGF?
Over the past year, USAI had a volatility of 19.93%, while IGF experienced 11.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: USAI or IGF?
As of March 11, 2026, USAI holds $96.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while IGF manages $10.00 B.
What sectors do the USAI and IGF ETFs invest in?
USAI leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, IGF focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the USAI ETF and IGF ETF?
USAI top holdings include WILLIAMS, ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS and KINDER MORGAN. IGF holds in its top three: NEXTERA ENERGY, ES0105046017 and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: USAI or IGF?
USAI holds 26 securities with 76.23% of its assets in the top 15. IGF has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.22%.
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
