Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
URNMvsNLRETF Comparison
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URNM's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. URNM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.56% for NLR. URNM is up 19.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$211M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with 12.97% YTD performance, and +$687M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URNM and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
URNM vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URNM NLR | -7.86%-5.39% | +17.31%+6.61% | +19.91%+12.97% | +109.16%+94.51% | +130.52%+177.39% | +188.23%+215.30% |
| Flows | URNM NLR | +$57M+$243M | +$258M+$849M | +$211M+$687M | -$14M+$2.69B | +$423M+$3.81B | +$1.27B+$3.84B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URNM NLR | +49.11%+41.92% | +41.55%+37.39% | +34.76%+29.48% | +40.79%+25.14% |
| Max drawdown | URNM NLR | -21.26%-16.12% | -23.61%-25.64% | -50.18%-29.79% | -50.18%-29.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | URNM NLR | 40d40d | 86d104d | 485d116d | 485d116d |
URNM | NLR | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.50 | $141.12 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $68.68 | $142.87 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
URNM | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
URNM | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.50 | $141.12 |
| 1D performance | -1.72% | -1.22% |
| AuM | $2.29 B | $4.72 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.56% |
URNM | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | VanEck |
| Benchmark | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 17 | 23 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 29, 2019 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the URNM and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, URNM is up 19.91% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has returned 12.97%. That puts URNM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URNM or NLR?
Year-to-date, the URNM ETF saw +$211M in flows, compared to +$687M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: URNM or NLR?
Over the past year, URNM had a volatility of 41.55%, while NLR experienced 37.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: URNM or NLR?
As of March 9, 2026, URNM holds $2.29 B in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.72 B.
What sectors do the URNM and NLR ETFs invest in?
URNM leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the URNM ETF and NLR ETF?
URNM top holdings include CAMECO, URANIUM ENERGY and DEEP YELLOW. NLR holds in its top three: CAMECO, DENISON MINES and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: URNM or NLR?
URNM holds 18 securities with 80.69% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.88%.
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
