URNMvsICLNETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URNM's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. URNM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.38% for ICLN. URNM is down -0.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$411M in YTD flows. ICLN performs better with 9.6% YTD performance, and +$163M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URNM and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URNM vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URNM ICLN | +0.42%-1.41% | +6.30%-12.89% | -0.14%+9.60% | +5.48%+23.45% | +48.81%+20.86% | +57.36%-16.57% |
| Flows | URNM ICLN | +$78M+$112M | +$93M-$482M | +$411M+$163M | +$380M+$289M | +$584M-$1.11B | +$1.22B-$1.98B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URNM ICLN | +40.85%+31.05% | +43.72%+28.90% | +37.23%+24.58% | +40.44%+26.57% |
| Max drawdown | URNM ICLN | -18.08%-21.80% | -42.35%-28.47% | -50.18%-31.13% | -50.18%-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | URNM ICLN | 66d81d | 225d101d | 485d631d | 485d1775d |
Trading data
URNM | ICLN | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.38 | $17.92 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $54.63 | $17.82 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URNM | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URNM | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.38 | $17.92 |
| 1D performance | -4.12% | +0.56% |
| AuM | $2.08 B | $2.15 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
URNM | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index | S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 104 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 29, 2019 | June 24, 2008 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URNM
Canada
57.74%
Australia
15.55%
USA
12.92%
Other
13.79%
ICLN
USA
36.76%
China
22.42%
Other
40.81%
Sectors
URNM
Energy
75.4%
Non-Corporate
14.5%
Industrials
8.62%
Other
1.48%
ICLN
Industrials
48.56%
Utilities
41.75%
Technology
7.31%
Other
2.39%
Advertisement
Diversification
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
92.27%
ICLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.72%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
URNM
Cameco Corp.
19.40%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
14.50%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
12.73%
Denison Mines Corp.
5.06%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.82%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.62%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.54%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.32%
Yellow Cake Plc
4.30%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.14%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.14%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
2.78%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
2.57%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
2.24%
Boss Energy Ltd.
2.11%
ICLN
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
7.92%
First Solar, Inc.
7.85%
Nextpower, Inc.
7.54%
Bloom Energy Corp.
6.96%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.56%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
3.65%
Equatorial SA
3.30%
Plug Power, Inc.
2.70%
EDP SA
2.68%
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.46%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
2.35%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
2.22%
Suzlon Energy Ltd.
2.00%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
1.91%
Ørsted A/S
1.62%
Frequently asked questions about URNM and ICLN
How have the URNM and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, URNM is down -0.14% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 9.6%. That puts ICLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URNM or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the URNM ETF saw +$411M in flows, compared to +$163M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: URNM or ICLN?
Over the past year, URNM had a volatility of 43.72%, while ICLN experienced 28.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: URNM or ICLN?
As of September 10, 2026, URNM holds $2.08 B in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.15 B.
What sectors do the URNM and ICLN ETFs invest in?
URNM leans toward sectors like Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the URNM ETF and ICLN ETF?
URNM top holdings include Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd.. ICLN holds in its top three: China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., First Solar, Inc. and Nextpower, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: URNM or ICLN?
URNM holds 25 securities with 92.27% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.72%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URNM & ICLN
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
ICLN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
ICLN
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
ICLN
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
