New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

URAvsNLRETF Comparison

ETF 1
URA

Global X Uranium ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
+0%
VS
ETF 2
NLR

VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
+0%

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. URA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.52% for NLR. URA is up 6.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$894M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -3.04% YTD performance, and +$890M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

URA vs NLR performance and flow charts

Performance

051015%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Cumulative Flows

-50 M0 M50 M100 MAug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/04/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
URA
NLR
+8.42%+5.43%
-9.21%-8.92%
+6.72%-3.04%
+18.57%+4.09%
+111.92%+97.16%
+125.09%+146.07%
Flows
URA
NLR
+$67M-$61M
+$67M-$199M
+$894M+$890M
+$1.88B+$2.14B
+$2.79B+$3.99B
+$3.96B+$4.04B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
URA
NLR
+43.14%+38.46%
+45.47%+39.00%
+37.00%+32.43%
+37.36%+27.53%
Max drawdown
URA
NLR
-25.50%-21.97%
-38.47%-36.67%
-38.47%-36.67%
-38.47%-36.67%
Max drawdown duration
URA
NLR
92d92d
219d219d
219d219d
219d219d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
URA
NLR
Last sale
9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
$46.06
$119.95
Previous close
09/04/2026
$45.70
$119.19
Consolidated volume
09/04/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
URA
NLR
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA
NLR
Last price
$46.06
$119.95
1D performance
+0.79%
+0.64%
AuM$6.40 B$4.18 B
E/R0.69%0.52%
Characteristics
URA
NLR
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderGlobal XVanEck
BenchmarkSolactive Global Uranium IndexMVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index
N° of holdings-25
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateNovember 4, 2010August 13, 2007
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

URA
Data will be available soon
NLR
USA
51.08%
Canada
18.8%
Australia
7.41%
Other
22.71%

Sectors

URA
Data will be available soon
NLR
Energy
39.26%
Utilities
31.2%
Industrials
23.85%
Other
5.69%
Advertisement

Diversification

URA
Data will be available soon
NLR

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

83.33%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970
URA
Data will be available soon
NLR
Constellation Energy Corp.
9.13%
Cameco Corp.
7.79%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
7.24%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.17%
Fortum Oyj
5.91%
Centrus Energy Corp.
5.69%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.27%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.88%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.87%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.61%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.53%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.45%
Oklo, Inc.
4.39%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.37%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.04%
Frequently asked questions about URA and NLR

How have the URA and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 4, 2026, URA is up 6.72% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -3.04%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or NLR?

Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$894M in flows, compared to +$890M for NLR.

Which ETF is more volatile: URA or NLR?

Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 45.47%, while NLR experienced 39%.

Which ETF is bigger: URA or NLR?

As of September 4, 2026, URA holds $6.40 B in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.18 B.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up