URAvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. URA's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. URA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.52% for NLR. URA is up 8.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$842M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with 0.07% YTD performance, and +$1.12B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of URA and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
URA vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | URA NLR | -13.96%-12.68% | -8.50%-12.19% | +8.60%+0.07% | +46.90%+30.06% | +147.11%+130.23% | +142.53%+152.16% |
| Flows | URA NLR | -$54M+$170M | -$24M+$434M | +$842M+$1.12B | +$1.92B+$3.16B | +$2.87B+$4.24B | +$3.89B+$4.27B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | URA NLR | +44.88%+38.60% | +44.11%+37.58% | +35.62%+31.00% | +37.19%+26.39% |
| Max drawdown | URA NLR | -19.06%-16.37% | -28.67%-25.64% | -36.76%-29.79% | -37.14%-29.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | URA NLR | 30d30d | 97d104d | 214d116d | 738d116d |
Trading data
URA | NLR | |
Last sale 6/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.31 | $122.11 |
| Previous close 06/04/2026 | $50.28 | $131.57 |
| Consolidated volume 06/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
URA | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
URA | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.31 | $122.11 |
| 1D performance | -9.88% | -7.19% |
| AuM | $6.46 B | $4.57 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.52% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
URA
Canada
43.97%
USA
22.13%
Republic of Korea
16.43%
Australia
9.21%
Other
8.25%
NLR
USA
47.94%
Canada
21.88%
Australia
7.34%
Other
22.85%
Sectors
URA
Energy
51.28%
Industrials
25.36%
Other
23.36%
NLR
Energy
37.71%
Utilities
32.52%
Industrials
16.44%
Other
13.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.87%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
URA
CAMECO
22.37%
ALTC ACQUISITION
6.80%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.11%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.42%
US63253R2013
4.77%
DAEWOO ENG&CONST
4.46%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
4.37%
ENERGY FUELS
4.00%
PALADIN ENERGY
3.34%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
3.30%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP
2.83%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY
2.82%
DENISON MINES
2.82%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.33%
KEPCO E&C
2.12%
NLR
CAMECO
8.06%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
8.04%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
6.48%
PUBLIC SRVCE ENT
5.74%
PG&E
4.97%
FORTUM
4.90%
ALTC ACQUISITION
4.74%
US63253R2013
4.68%
CGN POWER CO LTD
4.53%
ENERGY FUELS
4.47%
PALADIN ENERGY
4.41%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.34%
CEZ
4.34%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
4.26%
DENISON MINES
4.12%
Frequently asked questions about URA and NLR
How have the URA and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 5, 2026, URA is up 8.6% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has returned 0.07%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: URA or NLR?
Year-to-date, the URA ETF saw +$842M in flows, compared to +$1.12B for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: URA or NLR?
Over the past year, URA had a volatility of 44.11%, while NLR experienced 37.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: URA or NLR?
As of June 5, 2026, URA holds $6.46 B in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.57 B.
What sectors do the URA and NLR ETFs invest in?
URA leans toward sectors like Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the URA ETF and NLR ETF?
URA top holdings include CAMECO, ALTC ACQUISITION and NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. NLR holds in its top three: CAMECO, CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP and BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: URA or NLR?
URA holds 49 securities with 77.87% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.09%.
Advertisement
Latest news about URA & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
March 24, 2025
URA
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
