UPARvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. UPAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.67%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. UPAR is up 1.54% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. CSHI performs better with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$1.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UPAR and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UPAR vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UPAR CSHI | -1.87%+0.36% | -1.98%+1.06% | +1.54%+3.83% | +0.91%+4.97% | +42.79%+16.74% | n/an/a |
| Flows | UPAR CSHI | -+$186M | -$3M+$570M | -$9M+$1.23B | -$6M+$1.36B | -$35M+$1.84B | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UPAR CSHI | +13.14%+0.23% | +14.69%+0.53% | +15.03%+1.10% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | UPAR CSHI | -9.76%n/a | -12.95%-0.18% | -15.67%-1.52% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | UPAR CSHI | 52dn/a | 229d6d | 330d20d | n/an/a |
Trading data
UPAR | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $15.32 | $49.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $15.33 | $49.60 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UPAR | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $15.32 | $49.59 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $54.72 M | $2.03 B |
| E/R | 0.67% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
UPAR | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Evoke-Aris | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 3, 2022 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UPAR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
UPAR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
UPAR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
UPAR
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UPAR and CSHI
How have the UPAR and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, UPAR is up 1.54% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 3.83%. That puts CSHI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UPAR or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the UPAR ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to +$1.23B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: UPAR or CSHI?
Over the past year, UPAR had a volatility of 14.69%, while CSHI experienced 0.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: UPAR or CSHI?
As of October 16, 2026, UPAR holds $54.72 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.03 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about UPAR & CSHI
ETF First Look: SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW)
March 13, 2025
UPAR
Risk parity ETFs: Were they effective in 2022?
October 20, 2022
UPAR
Advertisement
Advertisement
