UMAYvsQQQIETF Comparison
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. UMAY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. UMAY is up 6.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$73M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UMAY and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UMAY vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMAY QQQI | +1.06%+0.65% | +1.90%+1.01% | +6.31%+10.72% | +8.56%+14.06% | +38.85%n/a | +37.05%n/a |
| Flows | UMAY QQQI | -$5M+$447M | -$10M+$2.14B | +$73M+$7.55B | +$68M+$9.46B | +$39M- | +$71M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UMAY QQQI | +5.17%+16.13% | +4.41%+16.85% | +7.89%n/a | +8.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown | UMAY QQQI | -1.17%-6.64% | -1.84%-9.62% | -10.44%n/a | -12.43%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | UMAY QQQI | 9d13d | 30d76d | 86dn/a | 622dn/a |
Trading data
UMAY | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.88 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $39.08 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UMAY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.88 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.50% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $136.97 M | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
UMAY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2020 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
UMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
UMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
UMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UMAY and QQQI
How have the UMAY and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, UMAY is up 6.31% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 10.72%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UMAY or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the UMAY ETF saw +$73M in flows, compared to +$7.55B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: UMAY or QQQI?
Over the past year, UMAY had a volatility of 4.41%, while QQQI experienced 16.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: UMAY or QQQI?
As of October 16, 2026, UMAY holds $136.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $14.89 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about UMAY & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
Advertisement
