UMAYvsHELOETF Comparison
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. UMAY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.5% for HELO. UMAY is up 6.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$73M in YTD flows. HELO performs worse with 4.62% YTD performance, and +$1.07B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UMAY and HELO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UMAY vs HELO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMAY HELO | +1.06%+1.14% | +1.90%+1.63% | +6.31%+4.62% | +8.56%+7.59% | +38.85%+39.50% | +37.05%n/a |
| Flows | UMAY HELO | -$5M+$78M | -$10M+$618M | +$73M+$1.07B | +$68M+$1.14B | +$39M+$4.25B | +$71M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UMAY HELO | +5.17%+7.26% | +4.41%+7.02% | +7.89%+7.84% | +8.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown | UMAY HELO | -1.17%-2.37% | -1.84%-5.83% | -10.44%-10.86% | -12.43%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | UMAY HELO | 9d61d | 30d73d | 86d169d | 622dn/a |
Trading data
UMAY | HELO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.88 | $69.21 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $39.08 | $69.67 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UMAY | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.88 | $69.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.50% | -0.66% |
| AuM | $136.97 M | $4.86 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
UMAY | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2020 | September 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UMAY
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Sectors
UMAY
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
UMAY
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
UMAY
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UMAY and HELO
How have the UMAY and HELO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, UMAY is up 6.31% year-to-date (YTD), while HELO has returned 4.62%. That puts UMAY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UMAY or HELO?
Year-to-date, the UMAY ETF saw +$73M in flows, compared to +$1.07B for HELO.
Which ETF is more volatile: UMAY or HELO?
Over the past year, UMAY had a volatility of 4.41%, while HELO experienced 7.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: UMAY or HELO?
As of October 16, 2026, UMAY holds $136.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while HELO manages $4.86 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about UMAY & HELO
Hedged Equity ETFs: Options-Based Alternatives to the 60/40 Portfolio
March 25, 2025
HELO
Advertisement
Advertisement
