UMARvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. UMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. UMAR is up 8.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 14.89% YTD performance, and -$157M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UMAR and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UMAR vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMAR QYLD | +0.59%+0.16% | +2.94%+7.75% | +8.91%+14.89% | +10.40%+18.90% | +49.39%+61.52% | +47.48%+50.05% |
| Flows | UMAR QYLD | -$2M-$27M | -$55M-$5M | +$9M-$157M | -$56M-$173M | +$46M+$106M | +$56M+$4.78B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UMAR QYLD | +3.94%+9.99% | +4.95%+11.32% | +6.57%+13.49% | +6.98%+15.30% |
| Max drawdown | UMAR QYLD | -0.72%-2.63% | -3.74%-5.84% | -7.40%-19.06% | -8.87%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | UMAR QYLD | 15d12d | 40d39d | 73d239d | 483d771d |
Trading data
UMAR | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.52 | $18.45 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $43.45 | $18.37 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UMAR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexUMAR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UMAR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.52 | $18.45 |
| 1D performance | +0.16% | +0.44% |
| AuM | $142.51 M | $8.41 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.6% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
UMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
UMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
UMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UMAR and QYLD
How have the UMAR and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, UMAR is up 8.91% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 14.89%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UMAR or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the UMAR ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to -$157M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: UMAR or QYLD?
Over the past year, UMAR had a volatility of 4.95%, while QYLD experienced 11.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: UMAR or QYLD?
As of October 27, 2026, UMAR holds $142.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.41 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about UMAR & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
