UMARvsQQQIETF Comparison
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. UMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. UMAR is up 8.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 12.4% YTD performance, and +$8.00B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UMAR and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UMAR vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UMAR QQQI | +0.59%-1.70% | +2.94%+6.04% | +8.91%+12.40% | +10.40%+11.68% | +49.39%n/a | +47.48%n/a |
| Flows | UMAR QQQI | -$2M+$958M | -$55M+$1.80B | +$9M+$8.00B | -$56M+$9.60B | +$46M- | +$56M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UMAR QQQI | +3.94%+16.19% | +4.95%+17.07% | +6.57%n/a | +6.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | UMAR QQQI | -0.72%-6.10% | -3.74%-9.62% | -7.40%n/a | -8.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | UMAR QQQI | 15d21d | 40d76d | 73dn/a | 483dn/a |
Trading data
UMAR | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.52 | $54.12 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $43.45 | $53.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.52 | $54.12 |
| 1D performance | +0.16% | +0.58% |
| AuM | $142.51 M | $15.39 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
UMAR | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 2, 2020 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
UMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
UMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
UMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
UMAR
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UMAR and QQQI
How have the UMAR and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, UMAR is up 8.91% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 12.4%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UMAR or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the UMAR ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$8.00B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: UMAR or QQQI?
Over the past year, UMAR had a volatility of 4.95%, while QQQI experienced 17.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: UMAR or QQQI?
As of October 27, 2026, UMAR holds $142.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $15.39 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about UMAR & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
Advertisement
