UGLvsUCOETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Ultra GOLD ETF (UGL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF (UCO) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Commodity. UGL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.19%, versus 1.47% for UCO. UGL is down -18.45% year-to-date (YTD) with -$168M in YTD flows. UCO performs better with 231.75% YTD performance, and -$477M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of UGL and UCO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
UGL vs UCO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | UGL UCO | -9.23%+21.85% | +6.10%+64.02% | -18.45%+231.75% | -19.11%+227.72% | +221.82%+89.49% | +224.99%+161.50% |
| Flows | UGL UCO | -$90M-$41M | +$55M-$115M | -$168M-$477M | -$205M-$486M | +$81M-$600M | +$38M-$1.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | UGL UCO | +42.21%+54.00% | +57.40%+64.54% | +42.85%+55.71% | +38.02%+62.68% |
| Max drawdown | UGL UCO | -23.68%-20.49% | -48.52%-38.76% | -48.52%-48.93% | -48.52%-66.84% |
| Max drawdown duration | UGL UCO | 53d27d | 260d114d | 260d869d | 260d1582d |
Trading data
UGL | UCO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.78 | $63.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $45.90 | $60.88 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 19, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
UGL | UCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
UGL | UCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.78 | $63.59 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | +4.45% |
| AuM | $715.73 M | $502.23 M |
| E/R | 1.19% | 1.47% |
Characteristics
UGL | UCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | ProShares | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Gold Subindex | Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 1, 2008 | November 24, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Exposure data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about UGL and UCO
How have the UGL and UCO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, UGL is down -18.45% year-to-date (YTD), while UCO has returned 231.75%. That puts UCO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: UGL or UCO?
Year-to-date, the UGL ETF saw -$168M in flows, compared to -$477M for UCO.
Which ETF is more volatile: UGL or UCO?
Over the past year, UGL had a volatility of 57.4%, while UCO experienced 64.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: UGL or UCO?
As of October 16, 2026, UGL holds $715.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while UCO manages $502.23 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about UGL & UCO
Can Gold Miner ETFs Be a Better Alternative to Leveraged Gold ETFs?
August 7, 2026
UGL
Betting on Gold Prices: Gold Miner ETFs or Leveraged Gold ETFs?
March 20, 2025
UGL
Advertisement
Advertisement
