TBJLvsDIVOETF Comparison
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF July
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF July (TBJL) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. TBJL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.56% for DIVO. TBJL is down -5.62% year-to-date (YTD) with -$16M in YTD flows. DIVO performs better with 11.4% YTD performance, and +$1.73B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TBJL and DIVO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TBJL vs DIVO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TBJL DIVO | -0.13%+2.03% | -2.08%+3.64% | -5.62%+11.40% | -8.12%+16.33% | +3.75%+60.32% | -22.18%+70.24% |
| Flows | TBJL DIVO | -+$113M | -$2M+$375M | -$16M+$1.73B | -$19M+$2.24B | -$76M+$3.73B | +$5M+$5.98B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TBJL DIVO | +6.86%+8.36% | +5.65%+9.37% | +8.62%+10.63% | +10.65%+11.80% |
| Max drawdown | TBJL DIVO | -4.97%-4.23% | -10.94%-5.92% | -14.80%-12.14% | -29.14%-13.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | TBJL DIVO | 89d43d | 360d114d | 760d130d | 1776d329d |
TBJL | DIVO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.78 | $47.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $18.76 | $47.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
TBJL | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.78 | $47.81 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $8.47 M | $8.01 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.56% |
TBJL | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 18, 2020 | December 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
