TANvsURNJETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. TAN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, URNJ's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. TAN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.8% for URNJ. TAN is down -6.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$222M in YTD flows. URNJ performs worse with -33.98% YTD performance, and +$81M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TAN and URNJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TAN vs URNJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TAN URNJ | +4.68%-17.59% | -14.33%-23.83% | -6.85%-33.98% | -4.71%-39.16% | +4.27%-16.98% | -52.73%n/a |
| Flows | TAN URNJ | +$133M+$25M | -$153M+$49M | +$222M+$81M | +$278M+$93M | +$26M+$236M | -$908M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TAN URNJ | +31.98%+45.85% | +35.45%+49.25% | +36.13%+45.31% | +36.29%n/a |
| Max drawdown | TAN URNJ | -24.77%-40.64% | -45.54%-57.83% | -51.26%-58.46% | -73.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | TAN URNJ | 92d69d | 157d279d | 756d489d | 1816dn/a |
Trading data
TAN | URNJ | |
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM | $45.79 | $16.63 |
| Previous close 11/03/2026 | $43.34 | $16.65 |
| Consolidated volume 11/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TAN | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
TAN | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.79 | $16.63 |
| 1D performance | +5.65% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $1.08 B | $283.23 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.8% |
Characteristics
TAN | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | MAC Global Solar Energy Stock Index | Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index |
| N° of holdings | 35 | 41 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 15, 2008 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Exposure
Countries
TAN
USA
44.84%
Israel
21.81%
China
7.06%
Other
26.29%
URNJ
Canada
42.03%
Australia
31.81%
USA
19.07%
Other
7.09%
Sectors
TAN
Industrials
43.37%
Utilities
33.64%
Technology
10.65%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.41%
Other
4.94%
URNJ
Energy
91.74%
Other
8.26%
Advertisement
Diversification
TAN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.23%
URNJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
84.79%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
TAN
Nextpower, Inc.
10.42%
First Solar, Inc.
9.03%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
8.00%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
6.83%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
4.94%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.
4.92%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
4.60%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.83%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
3.82%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.79%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA
3.35%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
2.89%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.75%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.
2.72%
SMA Solar Technology AG
2.34%
URNJ
NexGen Energy Ltd.
13.19%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
12.16%
Denison Mines Corp.
11.73%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
11.48%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.89%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
4.83%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
4.40%
Boss Energy Ltd.
4.29%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.20%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
4.12%
Atha Energy Corp.
2.82%
enCore Energy Corp.
2.12%
Mega Uranium Ltd.
1.59%
Global Atomic Corp.
1.57%
Berkeley Energia Ltd.
1.40%
Frequently asked questions about TAN and URNJ
How have the TAN and URNJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, TAN is down -6.85% year-to-date (YTD), while URNJ has lost -33.98%. That puts TAN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or URNJ?
Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$222M in flows, compared to +$81M for URNJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or URNJ?
Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 35.45%, while URNJ experienced 49.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: TAN or URNJ?
As of November 4, 2026, TAN holds $1.08 B in assets under management (AUM), while URNJ manages $283.23 M.
What sectors do the TAN and URNJ ETFs invest in?
TAN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, URNJ focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and URNJ ETF?
TAN top holdings include Nextpower, Inc., First Solar, Inc. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.. URNJ holds in its top three: NexGen Energy Ltd., Paladin Energy Ltd. and Denison Mines Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: TAN or URNJ?
TAN holds 35 securities with 74.23% of its assets in the top 15. URNJ has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 84.79%.
Advertisement
Latest news about TAN & URNJ
From Ballots to Bloodbaths: How Political Surprises Can Rock ETF Markets
November 4, 2026
TAN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
TAN
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URNJ
Advertisement
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
TAN
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
TAN
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
September 20, 2022
TAN
Investing in solar energy with ETFs
June 7, 2022
TAN
Advertisement
