TANvsURAETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. TAN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. TAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.69% for URA. TAN is up 4.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$375M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -6.84% YTD performance, and +$828M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TAN and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TAN vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TAN URA | -11.07%-8.80% | -12.49%-27.24% | +4.27%-6.84% | +39.90%+7.71% | -18.94%+107.07% | -41.71%+147.73% |
| Flows | TAN URA | -$149M+$28M | -$51M-$69M | +$375M+$828M | +$510M+$1.83B | +$127M+$2.81B | -$483M+$3.90B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TAN URA | +44.03%+45.04% | +35.92%+45.12% | +36.11%+36.53% | +36.25%+37.57% |
| Max drawdown | TAN URA | -35.42%-34.73% | -35.42%-38.47% | -58.44%-38.47% | -73.61%-38.47% |
| Max drawdown duration | TAN URA | 64d89d | 64d187d | 1013d187d | 1736d187d |
Trading data
TAN | URA | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.37 | $42.49 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $51.24 | $40.81 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TAN | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
TAN | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.37 | $42.49 |
| 1D performance | +4.16% | +4.12% |
| AuM | $1.35 B | $5.53 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
TAN
USA
47.18%
Israel
21.86%
Other
30.96%
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
Sectors
TAN
Industrials
44.59%
Utilities
34.02%
Technology
11.87%
Other
9.53%
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
TAN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.59%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
TAN
First Solar, Inc.
9.79%
Nextpower, Inc.
9.61%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
7.16%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
6.62%
Sunrun, Inc.
5.00%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
4.71%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.
4.44%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
3.87%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.56%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
3.55%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA
3.46%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
3.30%
T1 Energy, Inc.
3.23%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.76%
Energix-Renewable Energies Ltd.
2.53%
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about TAN and URA
How have the TAN and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, TAN is up 4.27% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -6.84%. That puts TAN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or URA?
Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$375M in flows, compared to +$828M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or URA?
Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 35.92%, while URA experienced 45.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: TAN or URA?
As of August 3, 2026, TAN holds $1.35 B in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.53 B.
What sectors do the TAN and URA ETFs invest in?
TAN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and URA ETF?
TAN top holdings include First Solar, Inc., Nextpower, Inc. and Enphase Energy, Inc.. URA holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: TAN or URA?
TAN holds 35 securities with 73.59% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about TAN & URA
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
TAN
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
URA
Advertisement
