BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

TANvsQCLNETF Comparison

ETF 1

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

This fund is part of

Alternative Energy

+0.36%

Full TAN fund page

VS

ETF 2

QCLN

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF

This fund is part of

Alternative Energy

+0.36%

Full QCLN fund page

Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. TAN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, QCLN's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Cyclicals. TAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.56% for QCLN. TAN is down -6.85% year-to-date (YTD) with +$222M in YTD flows. QCLN performs better with 1.98% YTD performance, and -$52M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TAN and QCLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

TAN vs QCLN performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 11/04/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	TAN QCLN	+4.68%-9.28%	-14.33%-9.82%	-6.85%+1.98%	-4.71%-2.24%	+4.27%+28.21%	-52.73%-42.29%
Flows	TAN QCLN	+$133M-$35M	-$153M-$62M	+$222M-$52M	+$278M-$58M	+$26M-$590M	-$908M-$1.19B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	TAN QCLN	+31.98%+34.39%	+35.45%+41.53%	+36.13%+37.49%	+36.29%+39.42%
Max drawdown	TAN QCLN	-24.77%-20.26%	-45.54%-37.77%	-51.26%-42.86%	-73.33%-69.47%
Max drawdown duration	TAN QCLN	92d79d	157d154d	756d644d	1816d1821d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	TAN	QCLN
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM	$45.79	$45.17
Previous close 11/04/2026	$43.34	$45.44
Consolidated volume 11/04/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of October 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	TAN	QCLN
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM

Live

Closed

	TAN	QCLN
Last price	$45.79	$45.17
1D performance	+5.65%	-0.59%
AuM	$1.08 B	$481.90 M
E/R	0.7%	0.56%

Characteristics

	TAN	QCLN
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Invesco	First Trust
Benchmark	MAC Global Solar Energy Stock Index	NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index
N° of holdings	35	57
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	April 15, 2008	February 8, 2007
ESG	Yes	Yes

More TAN data on Trackinsight

More QCLN data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

TAN

USA

44.84%

Israel

21.81%

China

7.06%

Other

26.29%

QCLN

USA

90.82%

Other

9.18%

Sectors

TAN

Industrials

43.37%

Utilities

33.64%

Technology

10.65%

Non-Energy Materi.

7.41%

Other

4.94%

QCLN

Technology

32.17%

Industrials

30.51%

Consumer Cyclical.

15.18%

Utilities

10.57%

Non-Energy Materi.

8.91%

Other

2.66%

Diversification

TAN

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

74.23%

QCLN

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

74.71%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of September 30, 2026

TAN

Nextpower, Inc.

10.42%

First Solar, Inc.

9.03%

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.

8.00%

Enphase Energy, Inc.

6.83%

HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.

4.94%

Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.

4.92%

GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.

4.60%

Clearway Energy, Inc.

3.83%

SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.

3.82%

Sunrun, Inc.

3.79%

Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA

3.35%

OY Nofar Energy Ltd.

2.89%

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

2.75%

Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.

2.72%

SMA Solar Technology AG

2.34%

QCLN

Bloom Energy Corp.

10.82%

ON Semiconductor Corp.

8.69%

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

8.63%

Tesla, Inc.

7.74%

Rivian Automotive, Inc.

6.68%

Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.

3.99%

Nextpower, Inc.

3.90%

Vicor Corp.

3.59%

First Solar, Inc.

3.43%

Albemarle Corp.

3.13%

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.

3.09%

Acuity, Inc.

3.03%

Brookfield Renewable Partners LP

2.89%

MP Materials Corp.

2.78%

EnerSys

2.32%

Frequently asked questions about TAN and QCLN

How have the TAN and QCLN ETFs performed in 2026?

As of November 4, 2026, TAN is down -6.85% year-to-date (YTD), while QCLN has returned 1.98%. That puts QCLN better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or QCLN?

Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$222M in flows, compared to -$52M for QCLN.

Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or QCLN?

Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 35.45%, while QCLN experienced 41.53%.

Which ETF is bigger: TAN or QCLN?

As of November 4, 2026, TAN holds $1.08 B in assets under management (AUM), while QCLN manages $481.90 M.

What sectors do the TAN and QCLN ETFs invest in?

TAN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, QCLN focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Cyclicals.

What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and QCLN ETF?

TAN top holdings include Nextpower, Inc., First Solar, Inc. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.. QCLN holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., ON Semiconductor Corp. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..

TANvsQCLNETF Comparison

Invesco Solar ETF

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF

TAN vs QCLN performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the TAN and QCLN ETFs performed in 2026?

As of November 4, 2026, TAN is down -6.85% year-to-date (YTD), while QCLN has returned 1.98%. That puts QCLN better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or QCLN?

Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$222M in flows, compared to -$52M for QCLN.

Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or QCLN?

Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 35.45%, while QCLN experienced 41.53%.

Which ETF is bigger: TAN or QCLN?

As of November 4, 2026, TAN holds $1.08 B in assets under management (AUM), while QCLN manages $481.90 M.

What sectors do the TAN and QCLN ETFs invest in?

TAN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, QCLN focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Cyclicals.

What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and QCLN ETF?

TAN top holdings include Nextpower, Inc., First Solar, Inc. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.. QCLN holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., ON Semiconductor Corp. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: TAN or QCLN?

TAN holds 35 securities with 74.23% of its assets in the top 15. QCLN has 57 securities and a top 15 weight of 74.71%.

From Ballots to Bloodbaths: How Political Surprises Can Rock ETF Markets

Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” Passes Final Vote: ETF Winners & Losers

Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch

The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?

Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row

Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row

Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs

Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection