Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TANvsPBWETF Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. TAN's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, PBW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. TAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.64% for PBW. TAN is up 12.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$321M in YTD flows. PBW performs worse with 5.38% YTD performance, and -$173M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TAN and PBW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TAN vs PBW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TAN PBW | -4.34%-3.67% | +16.27%+4.87% | +12.62%+5.38% | +72.80%+97.90% | -26.01%-11.95% | -42.24%-66.64% |
| Flows | TAN PBW | -$69M-$107M | +$338M-$160M | +$321M-$173M | +$250M+$43M | -$87M-$82M | -$424M-$462M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TAN PBW | +30.96%+39.45% | +36.38%+41.71% | +34.66%+39.73% | +36.07%+43.04% |
| Max drawdown | TAN PBW | -11.10%-14.76% | -21.51%-23.20% | -66.38%-68.02% | -73.61%-86.22% |
| Max drawdown duration | TAN PBW | 23d50d | 56d53d | 1061d969d | 1593d1824d |
TAN | PBW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.38 | $32.21 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.75 | $32.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
TAN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
TAN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.38 | $32.21 |
| 1D performance | +1.15% | -0.56% |
| AuM | $1.45 B | $533.53 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.64% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TAN and PBW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, TAN is up 12.62% year-to-date (YTD), while PBW has returned 5.38%. That puts TAN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or PBW?
Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$321M in flows, compared to -$173M for PBW.
Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or PBW?
Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 36.38%, while PBW experienced 41.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: TAN or PBW?
As of March 13, 2026, TAN holds $1.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while PBW manages $533.53 M.
What sectors do the TAN and PBW ETFs invest in?
TAN leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, PBW focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and PBW ETF?
TAN top holdings include US65290E1010, FIRST SOLAR and ENPHASE ENERGY. PBW holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CH1403212751 and IM00BLCY1J27.
Which ETF is more diversified: TAN or PBW?
TAN holds 29 securities with 74.41% of its assets in the top 15. PBW has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.84%.
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
Investing in solar energy with ETFs
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.