Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TANvsNLRETF Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. TAN's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. TAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.56% for NLR. TAN is up 13.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$321M in YTD flows. NLR performs better with 14.26% YTD performance, and +$687M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TAN and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TAN vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TAN NLR | -4.73%-3.08% | +12.66%+5.28% | +13.06%+14.26% | +70.41%+93.04% | -25.72%+184.14% | -42.56%+213.22% |
| Flows | TAN NLR | -$65M+$199M | +$338M+$843M | +$321M+$687M | +$250M+$2.69B | -$87M+$3.81B | -$432M+$3.84B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TAN NLR | +31.54%+41.80% | +36.36%+37.32% | +34.69%+29.49% | +36.06%+25.15% |
| Max drawdown | TAN NLR | -11.10%-16.12% | -21.51%-25.64% | -66.38%-29.79% | -73.61%-29.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | TAN NLR | 21d42d | 56d104d | 1059d116d | 1591d116d |
TAN | NLR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.73 | $140.89 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $55.73 | $141.12 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
TAN | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
TAN | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.73 | $140.89 |
| 1D performance | -1.79% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $1.45 B | $4.77 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.56% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TAN and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, TAN is up 13.06% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has returned 14.26%. That puts NLR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or NLR?
Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$321M in flows, compared to +$687M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or NLR?
Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 36.36%, while NLR experienced 37.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: TAN or NLR?
As of March 11, 2026, TAN holds $1.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.77 B.
What sectors do the TAN and NLR ETFs invest in?
TAN leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and NLR ETF?
TAN top holdings include US65290E1010, FIRST SOLAR and ENPHASE ENERGY. NLR holds in its top three: CAMECO, DENISON MINES and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: TAN or NLR?
TAN holds 29 securities with 74.41% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.88%.
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
